|
| Other Assessment Findings
In addition to the formative surveys discussed above, the following
additional assessments were used during the course of the grant in AC 15
and AC 16:
- Attitudes - Attitudes surveys were conducted at the beginning
and end of each of the six semesters of the grant. Tables A.1 through A.4
in the Appendix provide listings of the variables used in these surveys,
together with semester-by-semester mean scores and selected comparison
tests.
- Knowledge - At the end of each of the first three semesters
of the grant, multiple choice exams were used to collect data on knowledge
acquisition. These multiple choice exams were found to be ineffective (see
comments in Section III, above - Problem #6), and, accordingly, were discontinued
in the Spring, 1994.
- Common final exams - As indicated in Section III, in the Fall,
1993, the project team began to control carefully the semester-by-semester
changes in the final exam for each course so that a fixed number of questions
addressed the same issues at essentially the same level of difficulty.
Tables A.5 and A.6 in the Appendix show semester-by-semester mean scores
and standard deviations (question-by-question and in total).
Brief comments on the attitudes survey and common final assessment results
are provided in the paragraphs that follow.
Attitudes Survey Findings
Based on an inspection of the results reported in Tables A.1 through
A.4 the following findings are of particular interest:
AC 15:
- Pretest scores - The following shifts in pretest scores
over the period of the grant (Table A.1) are noteworthy:
- Student attitudes towards the effectiveness of group work appear to
becoming increasingly positive
- Students report that they are increasingly proficient as writers and
computer users
- Posttest scores - The following shifts in posttest scores
(Table A.2) are of interest:
- Students find the new curriculum to be challenging and interesting,
yet very time consuming
- Composite measures regarding group, writing, and computer activities
are all moving in the desired direction and have changed significantly
over time.
AC 16:
- Pretest scores - The following shifts in pretest scores
(Table A.3) are noteworthy:
- Students report that they are increasingly proficient as computer users
- Posttest scores - The following shifts in posttest scores
(Table A.4) are of interest:
- Students find the new curriculum to be challenging and interesting,
yet very time consuming and difficult
- Composite measures regarding group and computer activities are both
moving in the desired direction and have changed significantly over time.
The above described shifts in pretest scores may reflect
impacts of gradual changes in curricula throughout the university (e.g.,
increased emphasis on writing skills, collaborative learning, and computer
skills) as well as "grapevine" effects of students passing on
their experience with the new curriculum to other students. In contrast,
the shifts in posttest scores appear to be more directly
attributable to impacts of the new curriculum.
Common Final Exam Findings
Examples of common final exams for AC 15 and AC 16 for the Spring Semester,
1995 are included in the Appendix. These exams were developed by the project
team (working together in weekly meetings) and were designed to be responsive
to the overall objectives and subobjectives that have been articulated
for each course. The semester-by-semester results reported in Tables A.5
and A.6 show consistency over time, except for the following: i) AC 15
- Fall, 1993, question #5: this question turned out to be unexpectedly
difficult; and, ii) AC 16 - Fall, 1994 and Spring, 1995, question #9: because
of a change in course content, the final exam was expanded to nine questions
in the Fall, 1994, which makes comparisons with earlier semesters difficult
to interpret.
Retention Rates
As shown in Table VI.6, retention rates before and after introduction
of the reengineered curriculum remained relatively constant. This result
has been encouraging because students have also reported that they have
found the new curriculum to be significantly more time consuming (see item
# 6 in Tables A.2 and A.4).
Table VI.6
Note: the table is stored as Microsoft Word
documents.
Home | Overview
| Introduction | Motivation
for Change
Structure of the New Courses | Obstacles
| Resources | Outcome
Measures
Reaction of Interested Parties | Recommendations
for Interested Parties | Links | Index
|