Home - Grass Fed BeefCSUC - College of AgricultureCSU, ChicoUC - Agricultural & Natural Resources

Conjugated Linoleic Acid (CLA)



Concentrations found in Grass Fed Beef:
C.A. Daley1, A. Abbott1, M. Basursto1, G. Nader2, and S. Larson2
College of Agriculture, California State University, Chico1
University of California Cooperative Extension Service2


Conjugated Linoleic Acid (CLA):

The term conjugated linoleic acid and its acronym CLA is a group of polyunsaturated fatty acids found in beef, lamb, and diary products that exist as general mixture of positional and geometric conjugated isomers of linoleic acid (Sehat et al., 1999). These compounds are produced in the rumen of cattle and other ruminant animals during the microbial biohydrogenation of linoleic and linolenic acids by an anaerobic rumen bacterium Butyrivibrio fibrisolvens. (Pariza et al., 2000).

Nine different positional and geometrical isomers result from this process, of which, cis-9, trans-11 is the most abundant and is the biologically active form. Cis-9, trans-11 makes up 75% or more of the total CLA in beef (Ip, et al, 1994; Chin et al., 1992; Parodi, 1997).

Over the past two decades numerous health benefits have been attributed to CLA in experimental animal models including actions to reduce carcinogenesis, atherosclerosis, onset of diabetes, and body fat mass.

The anti-atherosclerotic evidence was first reported in CLA treated mice by Clement Ip in 1994. Ip and coworkers showed CLA levels as low as 0.05 percent of the diet can have a beneficial effect in mice. A level of 0.5 percent reduced the total number of mammary tumors by 32 percent. These results also demonstrated that CLA administered through a dietary route was effective in providing protection against cancer (Ip et al., 1994).

In a 1996 supplemental feeding study, Carol Steinhart showed a lower level of LDL ("bad") cholesterol in both rabbits and hamsters treated with oral CLA, resulting in significantly less plaque formation in the aortic artery of treated animals (Steinhart, 1996). Presumably this reduction in plaque formation would therefore reduce the incidence of heart disease. Likewise, David Kritchevsky demonstrated that CLA levels as low as 0.1 percent of the diet can have beneficial effects by inhibiting atherogenic activity in rabbits (Kritchevsky et al., 2000). This particular study also showed a 30 percent regression of established atherosclerosis with a CLA level of 1 percent of the diet.


There is a plethora of data to demonstrate that CLA modulates body composition by reducing the accumulation of adipose tissue, primarily in experimental animals. In mice, rats, pigs, and now humans, dietary CLA has been shown to reduce adipose tissue depots (Dugan et al., 1999; Park et al., 1997; Sisk et al., 2001; Smedmen et al., 2001) Although there is some controversy within the human data, it is likely that dose, duration, isomeric composition, age and gender influence the outcome of CLA supplementation. For instance, lower doses (3g/day: Blankson et al., 2000) had little effect while larger doses (3.4 - 6.0 g/day) significantly reduced fat mass in humans (Zambell et al., 2000). These ultra high doses of synthetic CLA reportedly do not produce ill side-effects, indirectly demonstrating that the compound is in fact safe. Little is known of upper toxicity levels because there doesn't appear to be an unsafe dose.

CLA is found naturally in a variety of ruminant meats (French, et al, 2000) and dairy products (Dhiman, et al, 1999), due to the anaerobic activity of the rumen bacterium Butyrivibrio fibrisolvens. This rumen organism is responsible for the biohydrogenation of linoleic and linolenic acids into the conjugated isomers referred to as CLA. Because linoleic and linolenic acid is a precursor, diets rich in these compounds increase the concentration of the CLA within the fat depot of the animal. Lush green forages are high in this precursor, therefore, grass-fed ruminant species have been shown to produce 2 to 3 times more CLA than ruminants fed in confinement on concentrate-only diets (French, et al, 2000; Duckett, et al, 1993; Rule, et al, 2002; Mandell et al, 1998).

Conjugated Linoleic Acid (g/100g or g/3.50oz.)
Study
Feedlot/Concentrate
Range/Grass
Amount Increased
French, 2000
.37z
1.08w
2.92X
Duckett, 1993
.82c
2.2d
2.69X
*Rule, 2002
.26e
.41c
2.04X

Table 1. Comparison of beef raised on grass-based diets vs. concentrate-based diets.

To achieve biological effects, the average human would need to consume approximately 5 grams CLA/day. On average, a single 3.5 oz. serving of grass-fed beef provides 1.23 grams of CLA, 25% of the daily requirement for a biological effect. Conversely, conventional beef provides 0.48 grams in a 3.5 oz. serving, providing 9.6% of the CLA needed for positive physiological effects.

Grass-fed beef, coupled with the consumption of grass-fed dairy products could provide higher daily doses of CLA from dietary sources, providing the concentration of CLA needed for a positive healthful effect.

References

Contact information:
C.A.Daley, Associate Professor, College of Agriculture, California State University, Chico, Chico CA 95929, cdaley@csuchico.edu.

Copyright © 2004 CSU, Chico · College of Agriculture. All rights reserved.
Last Updated: March 9, 2004

A cooperative project between California State University, Chico College of Agriculture and University of California Cooperative Extension
Funded by Kellogg California Food and Fiber Future (CF3) Grant #P0076808 and Agriculture Research Initiative

Website Designed By: Brian R. Miller
Would you like your own grass fed web site? Information.