Putul Singh

12 June 1980

 

Putul: My father only negotiated for five days. He didn’t find out what anybody in Madhepur could have told him about the family: that I never could be happy there. My father-in-law never wanted the marriage. I think the negotiations were done by my husband.

My father-in-law is not well respected because of his mistress. At my marriage when I first arrived in Madhepur, there was a big scene (tamashya) at the feast (bhoj). My father-in-law sent his mistress’s son-in-law to fetch pan for the guests. When he did this, he used a special form of Maithili reserved for use with in-laws. All ninety Srotriyas immediately stood up as if to leave, since if this man was the relative of that son-in-law, it implied that he [the son-in-law] was also their relative. The disaster was averted at the last minute when my father-in-law locked himself in a closet for the rest of the feast.

CB: Tell me more about this son-in-law.

Putul: This man is wealthy, and he had run off with the daughter of my father-in-law’s mistress. People said, "The daughter is just like her mother"—that is, she married once and was widowed, and at a Dussehra festival she met this man, probably a Jaibar, and ran off with him. She is very beautiful, so probably my father-in-law’s mistress was once beautiful. She claims that she is even now more beautiful than me! Because of all this, my father-in-law is on shaky ground with his relatives, as the trouble at the feast demonstrated.

What do we learn from this dialogue. . .

 

1. . . . about how marriages get arranged?

 

2. . . . about options for women?

 

3. . . . about how sanctions are applied?

 

4. . . . about rank?

 

Back