Responding Ethically to Bio-TerrorismAre African-Americans owed compensation for past injustices? Would offering African-Americans reparations be an efficient, or even workable, solution to our former enslavement of them over a hundred years ago? If not, what might constitute an alternative form of restitution? The call for reparations is an opportunity for careful examination of slavery in Africa and America, the European-initiated slave trade, and the current state of scholarship on this topic in terms of its rise, expansion and demise. Each of the speakers below will address the issue of reparations from various perspectives in light of their distinctive educational background and in light of their experiences growing up in different parts of the world.
Hassan Sisay, History
Charles Cambridge, Business Management
Charles Geshekter, History
Joe Wills, Public Affairs (moderator)
Home School versus Public School: Is Democracy At Risk?William Murray, Ph.D. Associate Professor, San Jose State University and Adjunct Lecturer, Stanford University
While the use of infectious agents as instruments of war is not new, their use against civilian populations on a large scale for religious or cultural reasons is. Vast improvements in delivery technology and genetic alterations of pathogen virulence coupled with the fanatical zeal of some groups to use them puts our nation in a precarious and vulnerable position. Coming at a time when public health resources of every sort are at an all time low, bio-terrorism represents a murky and profoundly frightening political phenomenon by the public - and one that may force a fundamental shift in our perspectives regarding individual rights vs. the public good. Public ignorance and lack of integrated countermeasures will compound the difficulties of effectively dealing with the consequences of such an attack. As recent events have shown, the outcome of using biological weapons is poorly understood by those who must guard against such weapons, as well as by those who would use them. Nonetheless, our response to this threat will surely result in profound changes in our ethical sensibilities by altering our notions of public health and individual patient rights.
How Reliable is the Credibility of Preschoolers in Child Molestation Cases?Public schools. How quaint. The great gathering place for our young citizens. E Pluribus Unum and all that. But with more parents choosing to private school or even home school their children, is all this at risk? Can public schools be a force for fostering democracy?
Mark Keegan, Education (facilitating)
Anthony Graybosch, Philosophy
Donna Nichols, Paradise Unified School District
Sarah Pike, Religious Studies
To what extent can we trust the testimony of allegedly molested children against their offenders in court? How do we understand and morally evaluate children's perceptions of adults' actions? How does the questioning of children influence their perceptions? What is real or imaginary to a preschooler? Following a 25- minute video from a 20/20 episode in which the issue of pre-schooler testimony is explored, panelists will collectively address the above questions.
Anthony Graybosch, Philosophy (moderator)
Brad Glanville-Child Development
Celeste Jones-Social Work
Andy Dick-Criminal Justice
Judy Bordin-Child Development
| Two Part Series on Hate Speech and Hate Crime I. What are the Characteristics of Hate Crime Perpetrators?Thursday, March 7th, 7:30 PM, Wismer Theatre (PAC 135) II. Racial Hate Speech and Its Proscription Thursday, April 11th, 7:00 PM, PAC 134
|
Will We Let Children Change The World?
Wednesday, April 24th, 4:30 PM, Modoc 114
Most adults view schools as a place where children learn to fit into society as it is. And to make one's way in the marketplace. But Jean Piaget said young people want to astound their elders by changing the world -- hopefully for the better. Are we encouraging idealism, or thwarting it? What kind of world would young people like to build?
Mark Keegan, with local area high school teachers and students
The Nature and Discourse of Evil
Thursday, May 9th, 7:00 PM PAC 134
What is "evil"? What accounts for its existence? Are "ordinary" people capable of committing evil, or does evil primarily occur at the hands of moral monsters, psychopaths thought to be fundamentally different than the normal human being? To what extent can we, through free will, avoid evil? Is evil distinguishably identifiable from the good, or is our identification of evil ultimately a matter of our own particular perspective? Does evil seduce? Is evil an "objective" state of reality or is it more accurately depicted as an absence of the good? Finally, to what extent are we served (or disserved) by the utilization of the rhetoric that identifies "evildoers," namely, those in society whom we are quick to identify as a dangerous "them" (especially in times of war) in contrast to the non-evil-doing "us"?
Anthony Graybosch, Philosophy (On the nature and existence of evil)
Sarah Pike, Religious Studies (evil in the context of Columbine)
Rob Burton, English (Evil in the context of September 11th)
Joe Wills, Public Affairs (On the use and rhetoric of the term "evil")
Andrew Flescher, Religious Studies (moderator)