California State University
Program for Education and Research in Biotechnology

20th Annual CSU Biotechnology Symposium
CURRENT
APPLICATIONS OF PROTEIN ENGINEERING






ABSTRACT AND POSTER INFORMATION
Poster Abstract submission is now CLOSED

Abstracts are limited to one page. Please carefully read the abstract requirements and refer to the example below. There is no limit to the number of posters/lab; however, due to budgetary limitations, CSUPERB can reimburse travel expenses to the Symposium for no more than two presenting students/poster, no more than 5/PI with a limit of $150 per student. (Lodging and meals are covered by CSUPERB for CSU students whose posters have been accepted.)

Contents:

 

SAMPLE ABSTRACT

Increased DnaA Protein Levels cause Cell Death and
Aberrant DNA Replication in Escherichia coli

A. V. Grigorian#1, R. B. Lustig*1, E. Guzman2, J. Mahaffy3 and J. W. Zyskind1

1Department of Biology
San Diego State University

2Department Genetica
Universidad de Extremadura, Badajoz, Spain

3Department of Mathematical & Computer Sciences
San Diego State University

     Background: The dnaA operon of Escherichia coli contains the genes dnaA, dnaN, and recF. The dnaA gene encodes the DnaA protein, which is required for the initiation of DNA replication from oriC. The dnaN gene encodes the ß-subunit of DNA polymerase III holoenzyme (Pol III), which acts as a clamp that tethers the holoenzyme to the DNA template during replication. The RecF protein, encoded by recF, is required for the resumption of DNA replication after UV damage. In this study, we are examining whether an increase of the intracellular concentrations of DnaA, ß-subunit, and RecF together and separately cause changes in the rate of initiation, the rate of fork movement, the length of the C period of the cell cycle, and in cell viability.
     Methods: Plasmids have been constructed that contain all combinations of the dnaA, dnaN, and recF genes under the control of an IPTG-inducible promoter. Cells that have been grown in the presence of IPTG at various concentrations to induce the synthesis of these proteins were examined by Western analysis, flow cytometry, and pulse labeling with 3H-thymidine. Flow cytometry reveals whether chromosomal origins initiate at the correct time during the cell cycle and if forks move to the terminus. The C period was determined by inhibiting initiation with rifampicin and following the decrease in the rate of DNA synthesis. The SOS response was measured using a strain containing a sulA::lacZ fusion.
     Results:  Western and flow cytometry results indicate that cells with levels of DnaA four-fold higher than wild-type contain partially replicated chromosomes at the end of three hours of rifampicin treatment. Replication fork movement is slower in these cells at this higher induction level. Cell viability also decreased, but the SOS response is not induced. Cells with increased amounts of RecF alone appear to be normal with respect to initiation timing and replication fork movement, as are cells with increased levels of both DnaA and RecF together. A mutation in the recF gene, however, further decreases viability of cells over-expressing DnaA.
     Conclusions: It appears that a concomitant increase of RecF protein helps overcome the detrimental effects caused by an increase in the number of replication forks and a decrease in replication fork movement observed when the concentration of DnaA is raised four-fold.
     Acknowledgments: Funding for this project has been provided by the National Science Foundation, USA, grant MCB-9507209 to J.W.Z.


 ABSTRACT REQUIREMENTS
1. Abstract Sections:  All abstracts should be informative and contain the following sections:
  • Background:  A brief statement of study's objectives;
  • Methods:  A concise statement of methods;
  • Results:  A clear presentation of results which should be "data rich";
  • Conclusions:  A closing statement of conclusions (Do not make statements like "Results will be discussed.");
  • Acknowledgments:  Please acknowledge any CSUPERB funding of the research presented as well as other funding sources as appropriate.
  • Key Words:  Submit three key words for your abstract.
2. Text:
  • Use a short, specific title.
  • Use standard abbreviations only.
  • Use no professional titles with names.
  • Graduate students are designated with a (#), undergraduate students with a (*). These will be automatically added by your selection during abstract submission.
  • Multiple paragraphs are permissible within each section using a 5-space paragraph indentation. See the help screen for how to do this properly using html codes.
  • If references are used they should include first author initials and last name, journal (abbreviated and italicized), volume (bold), inclusive pages, year--all in parentheses.
3. Graphics: The abstract submission program accepts only text strings; thus, graphic tables, line drawings or photographs can not be accepted unless they are submitted as html text strings [eg.
<img scr="http://www.csuchico.edu/csuperb/Info.jpg"> ]. These must fit within the specified borders of one page with one inch margins and be print quality (300-600 dpi).

SUBMISSION

Poster Abstracts: Poster abstracts will be submitted through the online Registration Application program this year. Prepare each section of your the abstract in word with all appropriate formatting before you register. Copy and paste each section into the registration application. To have your abstract considered you must register and submit your abstract before the poster abstract deadline of  November 2, 2007


ABSTRACT REVIEW
Abstract Acceptance: This year the CSUPERB Strategic Planning Council (SPC) has recommended that the poster sessions be limited to 200 posters to ensure the sessions are high quality, manageable, but also rewarding for the students.  Based on previous experience, we anticipate that not all abstracts submitted to the symposium will be accepted for presentation. A panel of SPC members and CSUPERB executives will review submitted abstracts and accept posters for presentation at the 2008 CSU Biotechnology Symposium.

Review Criteria: The criteria that will be used for review of the abstracts include, but are not necessarily limited to, whether the:
  • research has biotechnology relevance
  • research goals are clear and the approach and results well-presented (i.e. the abstract must be well-written)
  • approach to answer the stated question is logical and well thought out
  • abstract describes experiments designed to answer a question rather than the development of tools needed to answer a question
  • number of other abstracts accepted from a particular laboratory is equal to or greater than 5
  • number of other abstracts accepted from a particular campus is considered low

It is of great importance to CSUPERB that we provide a positive and enriching experience to every student that is given an opportunity to present at the annual symposium. The Strategic Planning Council (SPC) of CSUPERB has made the determination that 200 posters total is the maximum number that can be presented if we are to meet this important goal.

POSTER INFORMATION

The poster sessions are open to all CSU students and CSU faculty members who are conducting research in biotechnology. The poster may not exceed the size of the poster board.

Poster Board Size: 8' wide by 4' tall

 

                            

For tips on poster preparation see the Poster Tips website.


CONTACT INFORMATION
     If you have any questions regarding the Poster Abstracts or Posters please contact:

Eric Nedelman

CSUPERB
San Diego State University

5500 Campanile Drive

San Diego, CA 92182-1230

nedelman@sciences.sdsu.edu

619-594-2822