SPAN
425 Applied Linguistics: Spanish Teaching Methodology
Course
Description:
Required
for B.A. in Spanish, Pre-Credential Option
Elective/Service
course for: B.A. in Spanish, General Option
Prerequisites:
SPAN 320 (Intro. to Spanish Linguistics)
The
overarching purpose of SPAN 425 is to aid you, a prospective teacher, in
exploring the professional career of teaching. This experience will help you understand factors that affect
K-12 student learning and the connection between university subject matter preparation
and K-12 academic content. You
will learn about the standards that individuals must meet to be recommended for
a California Teaching credential, and the standards that California public
school students meet. Through
experiences aiding and observing in an actual and needed role in a school, you
will have opportunities to reflect on and discuss the complexity and many
facets of teaching. At the same
time we hope that you will be able to assess whether teaching is the right
career choice for you.
In this course
you will develop an understanding of current theories of foreign language
learning through exploration of relevant research. You will read about and
discuss the implications of key research for classroom practice. Opportunities
are provided to use the theoretical base in the design of classroom activities.
Special attention is given to designing performance-based language assessments
and to adapt instruction to address the needs of exceptional students as well
as those in at-risk categories.
The class will introduce a variety of strategies in dealing with
students from diverse socioeconomic and cultural settings. We will focus on
integrating effective technological tools into the design of classroom lessons,
selecting and designing materials (including visuals, props, and realia) to
support lessons, assessing student progress in an ongoing manner, and designing
performance-based instruments that integrate the skills of listening, reading,
and writing and address the national standards.
In the Early
Field Experience hours, prospective teachers acquire planned, structured
observations and experiences in secondary school classrooms. Placements
are made in selected schools and classrooms that demonstrate exemplary practice
as described in the California Standards for the Teaching Profession, and
represent California¹s diverse student population. Dialog/discussion sessions
assist prospective teachers in making connections between subject matter
courses, personal, social and emotional growth, and life in the secondary
schools.
In the
classroom, the primary modes of instruction will include lecture with
discussion, small-group activities and hands-on practice with instructional
technology. Students must participate in discussions, small-group activities
and presentations that will provide opportunities to apply the concepts and
techniques studied. The goal of this course is to provide experiences that
facilitate the development of professional world language educator-inquirers,
who are dedicated to continued professional development in order to plan,
implement and model best instructional practice.
Course
Objectives:
Students in this
course will:
·
successfully
complete a classroom aiding assignment in a K-12 school with students from a
variety of populations in California, and additional school observations.
·
understand
the development of language teaching methodologies that led up to and include
communicative language teaching.
·
understand
of some of the major theories of second language acquisition and their
applications to classroom language teaching.
·
use the
terminology particular to foreign language teaching that is necessary for
informed conversation in the field, especially to formulate and communicate his
or her goals for growth as a professional educator.
·
reflect
intelligently upon their own and on others¹ teaching.
·
articulate
a personal philosophy of foreign language teaching
·
create and
draw upon an extensive resource packet
·
understand
the ACTFL Standards for Foreign Language Learning and be able to apply these
principles to the development of lesson plans and learning objectives.
·
understand
the Foreign Language Framework For California Public Schools:
Kindergarten-Grade Twelve and be able to apply these principles to the
development of lesson plans and learning objectives.
·
be able to
develop and tailor activities to help students develop listening, reading,
writing, and speaking skills in Spanish.
·
understand
a variety of assessment tools and methods to measure students learning in their
Spanish classes.
·
recognize
that developing teaching expertise is a life-long process
Reading
materials required:
Books:
O¹Hair, M. J.,
McLaughlin, H. J., and Reitzug, U. C.
Foundations of democratic education, Harcourt, 2000. (This text is used in throughout the
Multiple and Single Subject Programs of the Department of Education at CSU,
Chico.)
Santos
Gargallo, I. Lingüística aplicada a la enseñanza- aprendizaje del español
como lengua extranjera. Madrid:
Arco Libros, 1999.
Available
on WebCT:
ACTFL
Program Standards for the Preparation of Foreign Language Teachers. Prepared by the Foreign Language Teacher
Standards Writing Team August 1, 2002; Approved By The Specialty Areas Studies
Board National Council for Accreditation of Teacher Education October 19, 2002
ACTFL
Performance Guidelines for K-12 Learners. Yonkers, NY: ACTFL, 1998.
ACTFL
Revised Proficiency
Guidelines — Speaking
ACTFL
Revised Proficiency Guidelines — Writing
ACTFL
Revised Proficiency Guidelines — Listening
ACTFL
Revised Proficiency Guidelines — Reading
Standards
for Foreign Language Learning in the 21st Century (1999),
Foreign Language
Framework For California Public Schools: Kindergarten-Grade Twelve. 1989.
Sacramento: California Department of Education.
³A Guide to
Aligning Curriculum with the Standards.² 1996. Ames: National K–12
Foreign Language Resource Center, Iowa State University. This publication is
available only online at <http://www.educ.iastate.edu/nflrc/
publications/stds.htm#guide>.
Handbook for Planning an Effective
Foreign Language Program. 1985. Sacramento: California
Department of Education.
Teacher Preparation in Languages
Other Than English: Quality and Effectiveness Standards for Subject Matter
Programs in California. 1994. Handbook for Teacher Educators and Program Reviewers.
Sacramento: Commission on Teacher Credentialing.
Course
Policies:
Attendance
Because this course is focused not
only on the theory, but also on the practice of teaching foreign languages, it
is extremely important that you come to class regularly and on time. If you must
miss a class or come late, please tell me ahead of time.
Academic Integrity
As
a student at CSUC, you are responsible for maintaining ³a high standard of
academic integrity² (2005-07 CSUC Catalog p. 623) in all the work you do here.
Teaching is a cooperative endeavor; in this class, collaborative study (with
me, with your classmates, and with friends and family) is expected and
encouraged. Authorized aid includes studying with a partner or a group for the
chapter quizzes and discussing ideas, methods, and techniques for the
microteaching sessions. Unauthorized aid includes using any outside resources
during the chapter quizzes and using wholesale/verbatim another instructor¹s
activity or lesson plan for the microteaching sessions. If you are in doubt
about how to maintain academic integrity in any activity associated with this
course, please consult with the professor.
Course
Topics and Schedule:
All topics
and assignments are designed to introduce the prospective teacher of Spanish to
the most fundamental concepts related to the teaching of the target language in
California secondary schools and to prepare for future studies (e.g. Single
Subject or BCLAD Credential program).
This course adheres to requirements set out in the 2004 Languages Other
Than English Single Subject Matter Standards for the Single Subject Teaching Credential California Commission on Teacher Credentialing (LOTE).
Topic 1: Discussion of Classroom Aiding—Introduced in Week 1 and
reinforced throughout semester
The classroom aiding or
service-learning component of SPAN 425 is the heart of the course. Your
experience in a school and classroom provides the basis for observations,
reflections, and discussions. A
minimum of 45 hours of service as a classroom aide is required. A form
documenting your hours and signed by the teacher you are working with will show
that you have met the school-hours requirement. The teacher will also complete
an evaluation form and the CSU, Chico Teacher Candidate Disposition Form for
your application for admission to a credential program.
See Early School
Experience Options (at Assignments and Info) for additional information about
acceptable school and related experiences. If you will be working in a school in Chico, school
placements must be arranged through Community Action Volunteers in Education
(CAVE). Forms for CAVE placements can be found in CAVE Placement Forms (at
Assignments and Info).
Topic
2. Overview of the
teaching methods used in Foreign Language—Week 2
Total Physical
Response, The Silent Way, Suggestopedia, Lexical Approach, Competency-Based
Language Teaching, Communicative Language Teaching, Natural Approach,
Content-Based Instruction, Task-Based Language Learning. We also will touch on
learning concepts that are not unique to Foreign Language: Whole Language,
Cooperative Learning, and more.
(LOTE 4, 5)
Topic
3. Overview of L2
Acquisition and Educational Psychology—Week 3
The program
prepares candidates to demonstrate an understanding of the language acquisition
process; developmental patterns of language learning; the cognitive, affective,
and social factors impacting language teaching and learning; and the
interrelationship of language and culture. We also will discuss Multiple
Intelligences, Neurolinguistic Programming, and more. (LOTE 2.5 and 12.4)
Topic
4.
Technology—introduced in Week 4 and reinforced throughout semester
Spanish
students have full access to the Multi-Media Language Learning Center in Taylor
207. This is a state-of-the-art
computer laboratory equipped with Internet access, programs integral to
language-learning activities (e.g. Divace), a database of activities based on
appropriate use of technology in the classroom. Students will practice using various programs, learn to
manage equipment, study the use of available language-learning activities, and
create activities using technology.
The study and
application of current and emerging technologies, with a focus on those used in
K-12 schools, for gathering, analyzing, managing, processing, and presenting
information is an integral component of each prospective teacher¹s program study.
Prospective teachers are introduced to legal, ethical, and social issues
related to technology. The program prepares prospective teachers to meet the
current technology requirements for admission to an approved California
professional teacher preparation program. (LOTE 3)
Topic
5. Equity and
Diversity—Week 5
Discussions
and readings will focus on the implications of teaching in a global
society. We will look at how
student and teacher diversity enriches the classroom environment, impacts
learning styles, and guides our perceptions of our surroundings. In particular, we will focus on what
the Heritage Learner brings to the classroom, and what we can contribute
specifically to the Heritage Learner.
Human differences and similarities to be examined in the program
include, but are not limited to those of sex, race, ethnicity, socio-economic
status, religion, sexual orientation, and exceptionality. The program may also
include study of other human similarities and differences. The curriculum in
the Subject Matter Program reflects the perspectives and contributions of
diverse groups from a variety of cultures to the disciplines of study. (LOTE 2,
20)
Topic
6. National Standards
for Foreign Language Learning (The 5 C¹s)—Introduced in Week 6 and
reinforced throughout semester
Students will
learn how to interpret and apply the ³Five C¹s² (Communication, Cultures,
Connections, Comparisons
and Communities) in the secondary school Spanish classroom
and in the profession of teaching in general. These experiences enable
prospective teachers to interact with the larger cultural communities
associated with the target language to broaden their perspectives and
experience base for language learning and teaching. Candidates demonstrate the
ability to relate the target language to broaden their perspective and
experience base for language learning and teaching. Candidates demonstrate the
ability to relate the target language to other disciplines. (LOTE 4, 5, 20)
Topic 7. Foreign Language Framework For California Public
Schools: Kindergarten-Grade Twelve—Weeks 7-13
Topic
8. Reflection and Synthesis. Weeks
14-15
We meet three hours a week. It is
essential to such a small, practically oriented class that you come to class
regularly, keeping up with assignments so that you come to class prepared to
listen carefully to what your classmates have to say and to make insightful and
well-informed comments of your own.
In this course, two absences are allowed without penalty for family
emergencies or for any brief illnesses such as a cold or the flu. (If you find
you are dealing with an extended serious illness, please contact me.) Please
note that there are strict grade deductions following these two absences
and that coming late to class or leaving early counts as a half of an
absence. If you are absent more than two times, no matter how active your
participation is otherwise, your participation grade will be reduced by 10
points per absence. Perfect
attendance will be rewarded with 10 extra points on the participation grade.
Beyond attendance, your class
participation will be graded according to the following criteria:
|
|
excellent 20 |
very good 18 |
good 16 |
so-so 14 |
poor 12 |
very poor 10-0 |
|
Remains alert, focussed, and responsive |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Has prepared by thoughtfully completing
reading assignments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Offers ideas, opinions, and questions
during class discussions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provides tactful yet substantive
feedback to classmates |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Makes connections between class topics
or Spanish course materials and Early Field Experience |
|
|
|
|
|
|
B.
Final Reflective/Analytical Paper on Early Field Experience
In this paper, you should:
1.
Describe in
general terms your experience in the classroom (and/or other Early Field
Experience)
2.
Analyze how
specific experiences or events have contributed to your learning and preparation
as a teacher
3.
Discuss the
diverse populations with whom you worked and what you learned through this
experience
4.
Analyze how
your early field experiences are linked to the content of coursework in the
program—both in SPAN 425 and other courses in Spanish (provide specific
examples, refer to course readings and discussions, compare to concepts
discussed in the courses)
5.
Evaluate
how well the Field Experience was structured, what level of support you
received, and whether you could suggest any improvements for future years
In preparation, students should keep
journal of experiences throughout the semester, writing an entry after each day
in the classroom, to have specific material for the paper. Include the materials that you developed
or your Master Teacher gave you to work with. You will turn in the journal and materials used in the
classroom along with the paper.
(LOTE 4, 9)
C. Analysis and Presentation of 1 critical article on
pedagogy, L2 acquisition, or other topic covered in the course.
Once during the semester, you will write a 2-3 page summary
and discussion of an article pertaining to a class topic. The article will be chosen in
consultation with the professor, possibly from the bibliography of recommended
readings on this syllabus. You
will complete an in-class oral presentation based on your synthesis of the
article. In your presentation, you
will present your summary, answer questions from classmates, and lead a short
discussion on how the article pertains to students¹ Early Field Experiences.
(LOTE 4, 5.)
D. Quizzes on Readings
On
a regular basis, students will be tested over the comprehension of readings and
the ability to synthesize ideas in Spanish. (LOTE 4, 5)
E. Portfolio of Teaching Materials
Throughout the semester you will develop a Portfolio of
Teaching Materials that will be compiled and turned in at the end of the
semester. The Portfolio of Teaching Materials is a collection of ideas,
activities, and resource materials that you will gather throughout the semester
and that you will be able to add to and draw upon throughout your career as a
foreign language teacher. You may choose whichever format you find easiest to
deal with—perhaps a folder, a
series of manilla envelopes, or a binder with page protectors for any
loose items.
You will be required to include activity plans that will
utilize some of the materials you collect. (Specified for each section, below).
The activity can be one that you create, either by modifying a textbook
activity in an interesting way, or by developing the activity entirely
yourselves (possibly by incorporating authentic materials). Not all your
activities need be entirely original creations, but your portfolio should
contain at least a balance of both modifications and original creations. The
portfolio should also demonstrate a balance of activity types targeting a
variety of language skills. Your
activity plan will include the following:
· what the activity is
· what the teacher should do and what the
students should do during the activity
· the materials necessary to carry out and
complete the activity
· the time needed to carry out the activity
· the pedagogical purpose of the activity
(why did you use this activity?)
· how the activity reflects methods and
best instructional practice as detailed in the LOTE Single Subject Standards
(CCTC), ACTFL Standards, National Standards (5 C¹s) and/or California Foreign
Language Framework
· where the activity fits in the lesson
sequence and how it meshes with the text (i.e. input, asimilación, aplicación, integración..)
· what language skill(s) the activity
reinforces
· how the activity utilizes the skills and
knowledge you have acquired in your coursework in Spanish
If you are able
to try out the activity in the class where you serve as Teacher¹s Aide, you can
also provide a summary / analysis of how the activity went over in class (i.e.
did students enjoy it?, were you able to finish it in the time planned?, did it
target the language skill you intended it to target?, etc..) and how you
assessed this; an analysis of why it went over the way it did; and comments on
how you might do it differently the next time, if you were to do it differently
at all.
Your resource packet should include the
following elements:
1.
Summary
report of your interviews with two (2) teachers and two (2) students
2.
Summary
report of your classroom observations (Observation assignments will direct your
understanding of the school environment and the issues faced by teachers. The time you put into observations is
in addition to your classroom aiding hours. We encourage you to make observations in classrooms other
than the one to which you are assigned. Guidelines will be provided for the
focus of each observation/interview and the structure of the summary reports.) (LOTE
5)
3.
An
annotated list of at least 10 journal articles or books (from no earlier than 1995) related to
or useful for foreign language teaching; your annotations should each be around
100 words and should state in what way the source might be useful to you; the
following list contains the most well known foreign language journals, some of
which are available in the Meriam Library and others online:
ii. ADFL Bulletin
iii. Journal
of Educational Research
iv. Instructor
v. Journal of Language and Social
Psychology
vi. Canadian Modern Language Review
vii. FLES News
viii.
Hispania
ix. Language Learning
x. Modern Language Journal
xi. TESOL Quarterly
4.
A list of
at least 10 books and articles
you haven¹t yet had time to read but would like to in the future
5.
A
collection of at least 50 photographs or line drawings cut from magazines or photocopied from
textbooks or other sources that can be used in the classroom—together
with 5 activity plans that use one or more of the photos or drawings.
6.
A
collection of at least 10 pieces of realia (actual material from the target culture that can be used
in the classroom—brochures, catalogs, train schedules, etc.)
—together with 5 activity plans that use one or more of the pieces
of realia.
7.
An
annotated list of at least 20 web pages related to or useful for foreign language teaching; your
annotations should each be around 100 words and should describe the authors and
content of the page—together with 5 activity plans that each use
one of the pages.
The Teaching
Materials Portfolio is due on the last day of class; it will be graded for
completeness (20 points), thoroughness (40 points), and thoughtfulness (40
points).
F. Early
Field Experience Options
For admission to Department of Education Single Subject
Programs, our approved SB 2042 programs require that prospective credential
candidates complete a course that contains introductory school experience
elements of California Single Subject Matter Standard 6. The standard calls for significant
experiences in public school classrooms under the guidance of a credentialed
teacher. Appropriate classrooms
provide experiences with a population of students representative of the
diversity of California children and youth. Additionally, these standards require that opportunities be
provided for prospective teacher candidates to study, consider and discuss a
variety of contemporary school issues.
The Department
of Foreign Languages and Literatures offers SPAN 425 that meets the
specifications of these standards and includes a minimum of 45 clock hours of
early school experience.
Recognizing that many prospective candidates seek a variety of
experiences with children and youth, the department has designed the
requirements and options below to honor those school experiences.
45 – Hour
Requirements
·
Up to 1/3
of the experience may be in a private school.
·
Up to 1/3
of the experience may be as a substitute teacher or teacher-of-record with
written verification by a school administrator or teacher.
·
Up to 1/3
of the experience may be completed in a tutoring or other educational service
project or course that provides direct experience with students such as in a
special education setting, summer school, alternative education setting,
mentoring programs, specialized charter schools, magnet schools, after-school academic
programs, or other (see Program Coordinator for approval).
45 - Hour
Options
To meet
California standards for early school experience you can mix experiences from
the categories above. The basic
guideline is that a minimum of 2/3 (30 clock hours) of your experience must be
in a traditional public school setting.
Then, other experiences selected from number 5 in Requirements (above)
can be used to meet up to 1/3 (15 clock hours) of experience.
For the
professor¹s record keeping you must submit a plan for your early school
experience. Submit your plan through the SPAN 425
course email by sending a message titled: School Experience Plan. Explain the following:
You will write
a Final Reflective/Analytical Paper on Early Field Experience. See description
and requirements above. Student should keep journal of Early Field Experiences
throughout the semester, writing an entry after each day in the classroom, to
have specific material for the paper. Also, keep any materials used or
developed for class.
Many potential
credential candidates have significant experience with children and youth, and
in school or other educational settings.
You may have sufficient experiences to meet all or part of Department of
Education 45–hour requirements.
If you believe this is the case, describe your experiences (as in 1 and
2 above), and ask the professor to evaluate them for meeting the requirement.
The professor will respond with an email that you can print and submit with
your program application. In any case, you still will have to write the final
paper discussing your experiences.
Letters of recommendation and/or Teacher Candidate
Disposition forms will be used to verify your experience by department
staff. YOU must request letters or
TCD forms from current or former supervisors and/or Master Teachers with whom
you have worked.
Suggested Weekly Schedule
On average, a student in this course will spend
approximately six hours a
week studying outside of class in addition to the scheduled three hours a week spent in class, for a total of nine
hours dedicated to
learning foreign language methods each week of the semester. This is, of
course, an estimated average; the actual amount of time you spend on this
course may vary from week to week, and the amount of time you need to complete
the readings, study for the quizzes, and create and practice the microteaching
segments may vary somewhat from that needed by your classmates.
The following is a suggestion for how you might schedule
your study time, based on nine hours a week. Adjust the study plan to your
schedule, try it out, and modify it as the semester goes on until you find a
plan that fits your learning style and study preferences and enables you to do
well in the course.
Coming to class 3
hours
Reading material for class 1½
hours
Portfolio of Teaching Material 1/2
hour
Field Experience and Observations 3
hours
Studying for Quizzes 1
hour
Bibliography of Suggested Readings
³A Guide to Aligning Curriculum with the
Standards.² 1996. Ames: National K–12 Foreign Language Resource Center,
Iowa State University. This publication is available only online at
<http://www.educ.iastate.edu/nflrc/ publications/stds.htm#guide>.
22. Copyright © 1996 by College Entrance
Examination Board. All quotations reprinted with permission. All rights
reserved. www.collegeboard. com.
A Challenge to Change: The Language
Learning Continuum. 1999. Edited by Claire W. Jackson. New York: College
Entrance Examination Board, 21–43, 147. Copyright © 1999 by College
Entrance Examination Board. All quotations reprinted with permission. All
rights reserved. www.collegeboard.com.
A Nation at Risk: The Imperative for
Educational Reform. 1983. A report to the nation and the Secretary of
Education, United States Department of Education, by the National Commission on
Excellence in Education. Washington, D.C.: National Commission on Excellence in
Education.
ACTFL Performance Guidelines for
K–12 Learners. 1998. Yonkers, N.Y.: American Council of Teachers of
Foreign Languages.
Alonso, Encina. (1999) Cómo ser
profesor/a y querer seguir siéndolo. Madrid: Edelsa.
Altman, Charles. 1988. The Video
Connection: Integrating Video into Language Teaching. Boston: Houghton Mifflin
Company.
Approaches to Computer Writing
Class-rooms: Learning from Practical Experience. 1993. Edited by Linda Myers.
Albany: State University of New York Press.
Articulation and Achievement: Connecting
Standards, Performance, and Assessment in Foreign Language. 1996. Edited by
Claire W. Jackson. New York: College Entrance Examination Board, 16, 18–
Articulation of Language Programs:
Recommendations for Implementation Within and Among California¹s Elementary,
Secondary, and Post-Secondary Educational Segments. 1994. Edited by Hal
Wingard. San Diego: California Language Teachers Association.
Assessing Foreign Language Proficiency of
Undergraduates. 1991. Edited by Richard V. Teschner. Boston: Heinle Thomson
Learning.,
Bamford, K. W., and D. T. Mizokawa. 1991.
³Additive-Bilingual (Immersion) Education: Cognitive and Language Development,²
Language Learning, Vol. 41, No. 3, 413–29.
Bringing the Standards into the
Classroom: A Teacher¹s Guide. 1997. Ames: National K–12 Foreign Language
Re-source Center, Iowa State University.
Bruck, M.; W. E. Lambert; and R. Tucker.
1974. ³Bilingual Schooling Through the Elementary Grades: The St. Lambert
Project at Grade Seven,² Language Learning, Vol. 24, No. 2, 183–204.
Burke, K.; R. Fogarty; and S. Belgard.
1994. The Mindful School: The Portfolio Connection. Palatine, Ill: IRI/Skylight
Publishing.
California Special Education Programs: A
Composite of Laws (Twenty-fifth edition). 2003. Sacramento: California
Department of Education.
Cerrolaza, M & Cerrolaza, A. (1999) Cómo
trabajar con libros de texto. Madrid: Edelsa.
Challenge for a New Era: Nebraska
K–12 Foreign Language Frameworks. 1996. Lincoln: Nebraska Department of
Education.
Classroom Oral Competency Interview.
1993. Stanford, Calif.: Leland Stanford Junior University Board of Trustees.
Classroom Writing Competency Assessment.
1996. Stanford, Calif.: Leland Stanford Junior University Board of Trustees.
Curtain, Helena, and Carol Ann Pesola.
1994. Languages and Children. Making the Match. White Plains, N.Y.: Longman.
Curtain, Helena. 1993. An Early Start: A
Resource Book for Elementary School Foreign Language. Washington, D.C.: ERIC
Clearinghouse on Languages and Linguistics, ED 353 849.
Defining and Developing Proficiency: Guidelines,
Implementations, and Concepts. 1998. Edited by Michael D. Bush and Robert M.
Terry. The American Council on the Teaching of Foreign Languages (ACTFL)
Foreign Language Education Series. Lincolnwood, Ill.: McGraw Hill/
Contemporary.
Developing Communication Skills: General
Considerations and Specific Techniques. 1978. Edited by Elizabeth G. Joiner and
Patricia Westphal. Rowley, Mass.: Newbury House.
DiPietro,R. (1987). Strategic
Interaction: Learning languages through scenarios. Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
Foreign Language Framework for California
Public Schools, Kindergarten Through Grade Twelve. 1989. Sacramento: California
Department of Education.
Foreign Language Proficiency in the
Class-room and Beyond. 1998. Edited by Michael D. Bush and Robert M. Terry.
ACTFL Foreign Language Education Series. Lincolnwood, Ill.: McGraw Hill/
Contemporary (out of print).
Fromkin, Victoria; Robert Rodman; and
Nina M. Hyams. 2002. An Introduction to Language (Seventh edition). Boston:
Heinle Thomson Learning.
Futures: Making High School Count! 2002.
Sacramento: California Education Round Table.
Goals 2000: Educate America Act. 1994. HR
1804. <http://www.ed.gov/ legislation/GOALS2000/TheAct/>.
Hakuta, Kenji. 1986. Cognitive
Development of Bilingual Children. Los Angeles: University of California,
Center for Language Education and Research. ERIC Document Reproduction Service
No. ED 260.
Hakuta, Kenji. 1990. ³Bilingualism and
Bilingual Education: A Research Perspective,² NCBE Focus: Occasional Papers in
Bilingual Education (Spring), 1.
Handbook for Planning an Effective
Foreign Language Program. 1985. Sacramento: California Department of Education.
Hertz, Robert M. 1987. Computers in the
Language Classroom. Menlo Park, Calif.: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
Huebner, Thom, and Anne Jensen. 1992. ³A
Study of Foreign Language Proficiency-Based Testing in Secondary Schools,²
Foreign Language Annals, Vol. 25 (April), 105–15.
LaReau, Paul, and Edward Vockell. 1989.
The Computer in the Foreign Language Curriculum. Santa Cruz, Calif.: Mitchell
Publishing (out of print).
Larsen Freeman, D. (1986) Techniques
and Principles in Language Teaching. New York: Oxford University Press.
Lee, J. & VanPatten, B. (1995).
Making Communicative Language Teaching Happen. New York:
McGraw-Hill, Inc.
Lee, J. (2000). Tasks and
Communicating in Language Classrooms. New York: McGraw-Hill, Inc
Lightbown, P. & Spada, N.
(1993). How languages are learned. Oxford: Oxford University
Press.
Massachusetts Foreign Languages
Curriculum Framework. 1999. Malden: Massachusetts Department of Education.
Modern Media in Foreign Language
Education: Theory and Implementation. 1998. Edited by Michael D. Bush and
Robert M. Terry. ACTFL Foreign Language Education Series. Lincolnwood, Ill.:
McGraw-Hill/ Contemporary.
Modern Technology in Foreign Language
Education: Applications and Projects. 1989. Edited by William Flint Smith.
ACTFL Foreign Language Education Series. Lincolnwood, Ill.: National Textbook
Company (out of print).
Moskowitz, Gertrude. 1978. Caring and
Sharing in the Foreign Language Class: A Sourcebook on Humanistic Techniques.
Boston: Heinle Thomson Learning.
National Standards in Foreign Language
Education Project. 1996. Standards for Foreign Language Learning: Preparing for
the 21st Century. Lawrence, Kans.: Allen Press.
National Standards in Foreign Language
Education Project. 1999. Standards for Foreign Language Learning in the 21st
Century. Lawrence, Kans.: Allen Press.
New Perspectives and New Directions in
Foreign Language Education. 1998. Edited by Michael D. Bush and Robert M.
Terry. ACTFL Foreign Language Education Series. Lincolnwood, Ill.:
McGraw-Hill/Contemporary.
Omaggio, Alice C. Teaching Language in
Context, 3rd ed. Boston: Heinle & Heinle Publishers,Inc., 2001.
Omaggio-Hadley, Alice. 1993. Teaching
Language in Context: Proficiency-Oriented Instruction (Second edition). Boston:
Heinle Thomson Learning.
Oral Communication Testing: A Handbook
for the Foreign Language Teacher. 1977. Edited by Cathy Linder. Lincolnwood,
Ill.: National Textbook Company (out of print).
Oxford, Rebecca L. Language Learning
Strategies. 1990. Boston: Heinle Thomson Learning.
Padilla, A. M.; H. Sung; and J. C.
Aninao. 1994. Stanford Foreign Language Oral Skills Evaluation Matrix (FLOSEM).
Stanford, Calif.: Leland Stanford Junior University Board of Trustees.
Padilla, A. M.; J. C. Aninao; and H.
Sung. 1996. ³Development and Implementation of Student Portfolios in Foreign
Language Programs,² Foreign Language Annals, Vol. 29, No. 3, 429–38.
Pitkoff, Evan, and Elizabeth Roosen.
1994. ³New Technology, New Attitudes Provide Language Instruction,² NASSP
Bulletin, Vol. 78, No. 563, 36–43.
Reading/Language Arts Framework for
California Public Schools, Kindergarten Through Grade Twelve. 1999. Sacramento:
California Department of Education.
Restructuring California Education: A
Design for Public Education in the 21st Century. 1988. Sacramento: California
Business Roundtable.
Rosenbusch, M. H. 1991. ³Elementary
School Foreign Language: The Establishment and Maintenance of Strong Programs,²
Foreign Language Annals, Vol. 24, No. 4, 297–314.
Saenger, T. J., and others. 1988. Vision:
California 2010, A Special Report to the Governor. Sacramento: California
Economic Development Corporation.
Sánchez Pérez, Aquilino (1999) Hacia
un método integral en la enseñanza de idiomas. Madrid: Sociedad General
Española de Librería, S.A.
Santos Gargallo, I. (1999) Lingüística
aplicada a la enseñanza- aprendizaje del español como lengua extranjera.
Madrid: Arco Libros, S.L.
Science Framework for California Public
Schools, Kindergarten Through Grade Twelve. 2003. Sacramento: California
Department of Education.
Shrum, Judith L., and Eileen W. Glisan.
1994. Teacher¹s Handbook: Contextualized Language Instruction. Boston: Heinle
Thomson Learning.
Shurm, Judith L. and Eileen W. Glisan.
Teacher's Handbook: Contextualized Language Instruction, 2nd ed. Boston: Heinle
& Heinle Publishers, Inc., 2000.
Simulation, Gaming, and Language
Learning. 1990. Edited by David Crookall and Rebecca L. Oxford. Boston: Heinle
Thomson Learning.
Teacher Preparation in Languages Other
Than English: Quality and Effectiveness Standards for Subject Matter Programs
in California. 1994. Handbook for Teacher Educators and Program Reviewers.
Sacramento: Commission on Teacher Credentialing.
Teaching Languages with Computers. 1989.
Edited by Martha C. Pennington. Houston: Athelstan Publications.
Technology-Enhanced Language Learning.
1998. Edited by Michael D. Bush and Robert M. Terry. ACTFL Foreign Language
Education Series. Lincolnwood, Ill.: McGraw-Hill/ Contemporary.
The Power of CALL. 1996. Edited by Martha
C. Pennington. Houston: Athelstan Publications.
Trayer, Marie. 1997. ³Foreign Language
Standards: The Nebraska Story,² ACTFL Newsletter, Vol. IX, No. 3 (Spring), 10.
Wajnryb, R. (1992) Classroom
Observation Tasks: A resource book for language teachers and trainers. New
York: Cambridge University Press.
Weatherford, H. J. 1986. ³Personal
Benefits of Foreign Language Study,² ERIC Digest. Washington, D.C.: ERIC
Clearinghouse on Languages and Linguistics. ERIC Document Reproduction Service
No. 276 305.
Zaslow, Brandon. 2002a. ³The Classroom
Receptive Competency Matrix.² Stanford, Calif.: California Foreign Language
Project (unpublished document).
Zaslow, Brandon. 2002b.
³Framework-Aligned Instruction.² Los Angeles: School of Education, University
of California (unpublished document).