WWW pages liinked in the syllabus with weekly assignments and
objectives and WebCT
Purpose of the course...
The CSU Executive Order (Chancellor's Office) governing critical
thinking courses establishes our agenda this way: "Instruction in
critical thinking is to be designed to achieve an understanding of the
relationship of language to logic, which should lead to the ability to
analyze, criticize, and advocate ideas, to reason inductively and
deductively, and to reach factual or judgmental conclusions based on
sound inferences drawn from unambiguous statements of knowledge or
belief. The minimal competence to be expected at the successful
conclusion of instruction in critical thinking should be the
demonstration of skills in elementary inductive and deductive processes,
including an understanding of the formal and informal fallacies of
language and thought, and the ability to distinguish matters of fact
from issues of judgment or opinion."
All PHIL 102 courses satisfy CSU Chico General Education requirements
in Area A3.
This campus's policy states that students in a Critical Thinking course
must demonstrate
1. ability to distinguish between fact and judgment and between
belief and knowledge;
2. ability to distinguish between correct and incorrect reasoning,
including an understanding of the formal and informal fallacies in
language and thought;
3. knowledge of and skill in using elementary methods and patterns
of reasoning, including induction and deduction; and
4. ability to criticize, analyze, and advocate ideas with logical
force within human discourse, both oral and written.
The University also intends for every course to be appropriately rigorous. Our most recent statement on academic rigor can be found here. If the expectations it describes are not clear to you, don't hesitate to talk about it with a member of the instructional staff.
How we'll translate these policy statements into practice...
Conversations outside of scheduled class activities, which can often accomplish a lot in a little time
Grading...
These percentages are advisory guidelines to the final grade. |
| Participation and chapter reviews |
20% |
| Quizzes |
10% |
| Mid-term exam |
10% |
| Cumulative final examination on theory and application of critical
thinking method |
25% |
Critical writing (analytical essays)
|
35% |
Note on quizzes: Quizzes are all in WebCT and are pass-fail, with a passing grade of 60%. If your grade on any quiz is lower than that, you can raise it to passing by coming in
to the Resource Room and going over the quiz in detail with one of the
instructional staff within two weeks of the posting of quiz
grades.
Note on chapter reviews: Passing on chapter reviews is 100%. You have an unlimited number of tries to attain that score during the review's open period on WebCT.
Note on percentages: These percentages are advisory only. Final
grades may be affected beyond these percentages positively by especially
meritorious performance in some part of the course or negatively by
seriously deficient performance in one or more areas, including low
participation in course activities as evidenced by in-class writing. Do
not underestimate the importance of class participation (the CW1, CW2, and all of the CR
columns in WebCT) for your final grade.
|
Course Schedule by Week
To get the full benefit of this course, assigned reading must be done
before coming to class. To help focus your reading and your attention in
class, you should familiarize yourself with the critical thinking terms
and objectives listed for each week. Note that there is normally a 5-question text review quiz (e.g., CR1) in WebCT scheduled before each week's classes. Passing is 100%, but you can take these as many times as you want during the open period.
The PowerPoint presentations from the lectures are linked below. You
can view them in your web browser or in PowerPoint, which is preferable.
If you do not have PowerPoint on your computer, you can download a
PowerPoint Viewer. Click here for Windows. Click here for Macintosh.
A free
version of StarOffice is available here for Linux and Windows
users.
Use this syllabus as a study guide for the semester and for the final
exam.
Check WebCT regularly for open times of Quizzes (Q) and Chapter Reviews (CR). Non-recurring WebCT events are listed in a week close to when they open.
Week 1
"The highest form of bliss is living with a certain degree of folly." (Desiderius Erasmus, humanist, 1466-1536)
Reading: Syllabus
(CT) Chapter 1 -- Critical Thinking Basics; pp. 1-19
(WWW) none this week
Presentation files: About the class [download .ppt], Claims and Issues [download .ppt], Argument Basics [download .ppt]
Objectives: Be familiar with what the text says about basic
critical thinking skills and misconceptions about arguments, plus the
following concepts: issue/question, argument, conclusion, premises,
conclusion and premise indicators, subjectivism, relativism, claim.
Writing #1: "Intro" on WebCT, open until Tuesday of Week 2 at 11 AM
Week 2
"The specific meaning of God depends on what is
the most desirable for a person." (Erich Fromm, psychoanalyst/psychologist, 1900-1980)
Reading:
(CT) Chapter 2 -- Clear Thinking, Critical Thinking and Clear Writing; pp.
39-64
(WWW) Article
on Richard Clarke /
Brief critical analysis of the article
Presentation files: Definitions [download .ppt] and Fallacy Basics [download
.ppt], Logical Conflict [download .ppt]
Objectives:
Be aware of the different types of definitions: stipulative,
explanatory, precising, rhetorical.
Be able to recognize, evaluate, and create these forms of
definition:
by example, by synonym, analytical.
Be able to distinguish and remedy vagueness, ambiguity, and bias.
Be able to recognize, avoid, and repair these fallacies: division,
composition.
Be able to evaluate comparisons: completeness of information, same
standard
of comparison, same reporting and recording practices, comparability
of items
being compared, sources of numbers (including possible
omission of relevant facts), appropriateness of averages (mean,
median, mode).
Understand notions of logical conflict, contradictory, and contrary.
Quiz #1 (Q1) on WebCT; see WebCT for open period
Week 3
"How things seem to be is good grounds for a belief about how things are." (Richard Swinburne, philosopher of religion in The Existence of God)
Quiz #2 (Q2) on WebCT; see WebCT for open period
Week 4
"We will be better and braver if we engage and inquire
than if we indulge in the idle fancy that we already know -
or that it is of no use seeking to know what we do not know."
(Plato)
Quiz #3 (Q3) on WebCT; see WebCT for open period
Week 5
"Trust your hunches.
They're usually based on facts filed away
just below the conscious level."
(Dr. Joyce Brothers, psychologist)
Reading: (CT) Chapter 9 -- Deductive Arguments II:
Truth-Functional Logic; pp. 287-301
Presentation file: Boolean Operators [download .ppt]
Objectives: Be familiar with functions of Boolean
operators AND, OR, NOT.
Be familiar with basics of truth tables
Know rules for "if" and "only if".
Quiz #4 (Q4) on WebCT; see WebCT for open period
Week 6
"It is how you play your poor hands rather
than your good ones which counts in the long run." (General Douglas MacArthur)
Reading:
(CT) Chapter 10 -- Inductive Arguments; pp. 333-357
(WWW) TBA
Presentation files: Inductive Reasoning 1 [download .ppt] and Inductive Reasoning 2 [download .ppt]
Objectives: Be able to evaluate analogical and other
inductive arguments.
Understand concepts of representativeness, bias, sample size, error
margin, confidence level.
Be able to identify and respond to these fallacies:
- biased sample
- hasty conclusion
- hasty generalization
- anecdotal evidence
Understand problem of self-selected samples.
Understand problem of slanted questions in polls and surveys.
Know the law of large numbers and gambler's fallacy.
Work on drafts of two critical thinking analyses that are due on
WebCT and in hard copy on Thursday of next week. An explanation of
grading standards is located in the Analytical Writing Skills Rubric.
Week 7
"Being defeated is often a temporary condition. Giving up is what makes it permanent." (Marilyn vos Savant, 1946- , professional genius, writer, investor)
Reading:
(CT) Chapter 11 -- Causal Arguments; pp. 371-394
(WWW) TBA
Objectives:
Presentation file: Causation [download .ppt]
Know the post hoc fallacy
Understand the notion of hypothesis
Be able to identify these types of causal arguments:
Relevant difference reasoning
Common thread
Know common mistakes in causal reasoning:
overlooking alternative differences and common threads
focusing on irrelevant differences and common threads
overlooking possibility of reversed causation
overlooking possibility that stated cause and effect are both
effects of a 3rd cause
failing to consider the possibility of coincidence
Be aware of problems of:
appeal to anecdotal evidence
circularity
nontestability
vagueness
unnecessary assumptions
conflict with well-established theory
Know the rule of single causation and why it is useful (in-class
discussion).
Work on drafts of two critical thinking analyses that are due on
WebCT and in hard copy on Thursday of this week. An explanation of
grading standards is located in the Analytical Writing Skills Rubric.
Week 8
"If you live to the age of a hundred you have it made
because very few people die past the age of a hundred."
(George Burns, comedian, 1896-1996)
Reading:
(CT) Chapter 4 -- Persuasion Through Rhetoric; pp. 117-134
(WWW) TBA
Presentation file: Rhetoric 1 [download .ppt]
Objectives: Be aware of what rhetoric and rhetorical devices
are and have
a working knowledge of these types:
- Euphemism and Dysphemism
- Rhetorical comparison/definition/explanation
- Stereotype
- Innuendo
- Loaded question
- Weaseler
- Downplayer
- Ridicule/Sarcasm
- Hyperbole
- Proof surrogate
Be able to critique credibility of news reports and advertisements
Be familiar with concept of intentionality (presented in lecture)
Mid-term exam available on WebCT; see WebCT for open period
Week 9
"Each small task of everyday life is
part of the total harmony of the universe." (St. Therese de Lisieux, 1873-1897, one of the 33 Doctors of the Church)
Reading:
(CT) Chapter 5 -- More Rhetorical Devices: Psychological and Related
Fallacies; pp.145-163
(WWW) TBA
Presentation file: Rhetoric 2 [download .ppt]
Objectives: Be able to define what a fallacy is and identify
these informal fallacies:
- Argument from outrage (incl. scapegoating)
- Scare tactics (argument by force)
- Argument from pity
- Argument from envy
- Apple polishing
- Guilt trip
- Wishful thinking
- Peer pressure
- Group think fallacy
- Rationalizing
- Argument from popularity
- Argument from common practice
- Argument from tradition
- Relativism
- Subjectivism
- Two wrongs make a right
- Smokescreen/Red herring
Quiz #5 (Q5) on WebCT; see WebCT for open period
Week 10
"The universe is not only stranger than you imagine it to be...
it is stranger than you are able to imagine." (Albert Einstein)
Reading: (CT) Chapter 6 -- More Fallacies; pp. 173-189
(WWW) TBA
Presentation file: Rhetoric 3 [download .ppt]
Objectives: Be able to identify these informal fallacies:
- Ad hominem
- Personal attack
- Circumstantial ad hominem
- Inconsistency
- Poisoning the well
- Genetic fallacy
- Positive ad hominem
- Straw man
- False dilemma
- Perfectionist fallacy
- Line drawing fallacy
- Slippery slope
- Misplacing the burden of proof (incl. appeal to ignorance)
- Begging the question
Week 11
"There is no calamity which a great nation
can invite which equals that which follows a
supine submission to wrong and injustice." (Stephen Grover Cleveland, 1837-1908, 22nd & 24th President)
Continuation of topics in rhetoric and informal fallacies
Quiz #6 (Q6) on WebCT; see WebCT for open period
Week 12
"Character consists of what you do on the third and fourth tries." (James A. Michener, 1907-1997, in Chesapeake)
ALL-WEEK WRITING CLINIC--have drafts of your essays ready
for in-class and WebCT discussion work with staff and peers. An explanation of grading standards is located
in the Analytical Writing Skills Rubric.
Final versions of six critical thinking analyses due in hard copy
and on WebCT two weeks after you receive an advisory grade and comments on your draft. If the two-week point falls in the semester break, your paper is due within three working days of the end of the break.
Week 13
"Thus, the task is, not so much to see what
no one has yet seen; but to think what nobody
has yet thought, about that which everybody sees."
(Erwin Schroedinger, physicist, 1887-1961)
Reading:
(CT) Chapter 8 -- Deductive Arguments I: Categorical Logic; pp.
247-263
(WWW) TBA
Presentation files: Categorical Claims [download
.ppt], and Immediate Inference [download .ppt]
Objectives: Be able to write natural language sentences as
standard-form categorical claims.
Be able to recognize subject and predicate terms in a categorical
claim.
Memorize rules about "only" and "the only".
Understand the Square of Opposition, incl. categorical view of
notions of contrary and
contradictory.
Understand notion of complementary terms.
Be able to identify logically equivalent claims.
Memorize conversion, obversion, contraposition forms of immediate
inference.
Be able to represent single categorical claims in Venn diagrams.
Week 14
"The only unnatural sex act is one which you cannot perform." (Alfred Kinsey, sex researcher)
Reading: (CT) Deductive Arguments I: Categorical Logic; pp.
266-276
(WWW) TBA
Presentation file: Categorical Syllogisms [download .ppt]
Objectives: Be able to determine validity of categorical
syllogisms using Venn diagrams.
(This includes being able to apply all techniques in the Categorical
Logic chapter except the Rules Method.)
Quiz #7 on WebCT; see WebCT for open period
Week 15
"The highest reward for a person's toil is not
what they get for it, but what they become by it." (John Ruskin, 1819-1900, essayist, friend of Alice [Alice in Wnderland] Liddell, and major influence on Mahatma Gandhi)
Reading:
(CT) Chapter 12 -- Moral, Legal, and Aesthetic Reasoning; pp. 419-440
NOTE: Do not use concepts from this chapter in analytical essays. Also note that you may easily find yourself disagreeing with Moore and Parker in this chapter; if you do, the important thing is to have good reasons for it.
Presentation file: Moral Reasoning [download
.ppt]
Objectives:
Understand why a non sequitur is a logical problem.
Be aware of the underlying logical issues in the naturalistic fallacy.
Understand issue of consistency/inconsistency in moral reasoning.
Be able to discuss moral relativism and subjectivism.
Review for final exam through study of issues in this chapter.
Week 16
"There is no knowledge that is not power." (Ralph Waldo Emerson, 1803-1882, essayist and lecturer)