![]() |
||||||
| May 2, 2002 Volume 32 Number 15 |
A publication for the faculty, staff, administrators, and friends of California State University, Chico | |||||
|
|
|
CHAIR PERSONS: ACADEMIC SENATE Utilizing Emerging Technologies
At the recent CSU Academic Technology Planning Conference,
faculty, staff, and administrators from each of the CSU campuses had an
opportunity to discuss some of the barriers to utilizing emerging technologies
in higher education. Funding and high faculty workloads are often-cited
impediments to a faculty members ability to employ new technology
in the learning environment. Student access and ability to purchase new
technology is also a factor. A student technology fee might help defer or make the
costs more manageable for students and faculty. At San Jose State, students
in a pilot program will be able to lease high-end computer notebooks for
three years for $1,000 ($167 each semester, no interest). Students will
have the latest programs and the technical support/repair included in
the lease. The notebooks are wireless, enabling students to interact with
the professor and with other students wherever they may be. The notebooks
can be hardwired or docked at home, eliminating the need and cost of a
second desktop computer. Participating professors are given a free notebook
computer. Whenever a professor teaches a new course or adopts
a new approach to teaching, there will be successes and failures. The
key is to reward exploration into new teaching techniques and provide
the resources and technical support necessary to improve student knowledge,
attitudes, and skills. Why would a successful and untenured professor
want to experiment with new teaching techniques and/or technology that
could negatively impact RTP? The current RTP process does little to reward
the substantial effort it takes to learn new programs and design computer-assisted
courses, especially when success may or may not result. One professor who designed a now-famous computer-assisted
program to help students learn Chinese characters indicated that, after
three years, it was clear that the program was successful for upper-division
students but not for first-year students. Another professor had students
composing and playing music on a computer in 10 weeks in an introduction
to appreciation of music course. College departments are often isolated nation states,
with few incentives to work cooperatively. Funding is often tied to the
number of students or number of professors in a departmental unit. Professors
teach in arbitrarily fixed hourly units, leaving little room for interdisciplinary
or shared teaching experiences for students. An open learning community
is one of the hallmarks of the new online community. With current technology,
it is possible to team-teach, be interdisciplinary, and engage the public
and private sectors in education. The current workload allocation system
remains stuck in the tar pits. The workload allocation formula should
be revised to allow for innovation and creativity in cooperative learning
communities. Technology must not be viewed as a substitution for
good teaching. Most good teachers find that technology is a teaching aid,
requiring practice and careful use to be effective. It takes time and
practice to effectively use a new tool. Technology should
not be viewed as a means to increase student-faculty ratios or
efficiency, as one CSU president at the conference suggested. The new
technology allows for more interaction with students and other learners,
demanding more, not less, time with each student. Information overload
with Web-based resources requires that new skills be taught to enable
students to differentiate scholarship from sham. The academic technology conference was exciting. I imagined
my students reading an assigned Supreme Court case and choosing to walk
into a virtual courtroom, looking on as the lawyers presented the case
and the judges asked probing questions. The students could interact with
other students while in the virtual courtroom and choose to return to
the assigned reading when ready. The students in the virtual courtroom
might be visited by other students in the same class or by students at
distant locations. Imagine a virtual conversation with Justices Oliver
Wendell Holmes, William Douglas, or Thurgood Marshall! An environment that encourages exploration and utilization of new teaching techniques should be fostered and encouraged through the RTP process and the granting of release time. Paul Persons, Academic Senate |
||||
| CSU,
Chico | Admissions
| Bookstore | Catalog
| Schedule | Library
| Help University Publications California State University, Chico 400 West First Street Chico, CA 95929-0040 530-898-4263 publications@csuchico.edu |
||||||