 |
The Freshman-Year Experience: Keystone of Distinctiveness
Paul J. Zingg and Scott G. McNall
A keystone is a stone in an archway that holds all others in
place. Depending on the size and mass of the arch, a great deal
of preparation is essential before the keystone is added. After
the cornerstones are set in place, and building blocks piled up
to support the weight of the arch, a wooden structure is erected
in the center to support the upward curving stones, until they
meet. Once the two sides of the archway are completed, the
keystone is slipped into place, the structure is locked into a
solid formation, and the scaffolding is removed. What is built
can endure for centuries. We believe the University has approached
the matter of student learning and student success intentionally
and carefully, like the building of an arch. Each expression of
this effort contributes to a strong and distinctive learning structure.
The Freshman-Year Experience initiative reflects the integration
of many efforts.
The cornerstones upon which the Freshman-Year Experience rests
are (1) Strategic Priority #1 of the Strategic Plan for the Future, “believing
in the primacy of student learning, we will continue to develop
high-quality learning environments both in and outside of the classroom,” and
(2) the Seven Principles of Good Practice in Undergraduate Education.
Working to implement our first strategic priority has animated
the campus for years, because it is ultimately what the University
is all about—teaching and learning and the recognition that
it occurs in many dimensions of students’ lives. Our second
cornerstone grew directly out of efforts by a number of groups
to define what constituted good teaching. We embraced the
Seven Principles because these are proven practices that allowed
students to succeed.
The Seven Principles are so important to the campus that they
now inform our General Education Program; they are embedded in
our retention, tenure, and promotion processes; and they guide
the continued development and elaboration of co-curricular programs
and academic programs. They will shape the development of our campus
Master Planning efforts as we design a green campus and create
a physical environment that can help us realize these principles,
e.g., enhancing student-faculty interaction, creating additional
spaces for students to come together and learn, and using the physical
spaces and features of the campus to reinforce messages about the
environment and the history of the region.
Assessment of our programs and implementation efforts is driven
by our primary goal, which is to assure student success. A primary
question that we have posed is whether or not we are in fact practicing
the Seven Principles and whether or not it makes a difference to
our students. One of our first efforts along these lines was to
poll a random sample of all of our freshmen and seniors, as part
of the National Study of Student Engagement (NSSE). The NSSE questions
were designed to find out whether or not a campus was engaged in
the kind of practices that would enhance student learning. The
study also allowed us to compare ourselves to similar campuses,
and to measure our accomplishments against those of others. Some
of the results (e.g., compared to other campuses our students were
not getting off to a good start and were not actively involved
in their learning) were a bit surprising, because we all thought
that we were doing what was necessary to help students succeed.
We administered the same questionnaire after two years and found
that the results of the second poll paralleled the first. This
suggested that we needed to examine more closely the experiences
of our first-year students and campus practices.
We became involved in the national “Foundations of Excellence in
the First College Year” project in 2003. A campus-wide Task Force was formed
to assure that all vice-presidential units were focused on student learning inside
and outside of the classroom, and to bring coherence to the planning efforts
of the three vice-presidential units to assure we were working as one university
to achieve distinction. National leaders in the first-year experience and experts
in program development and assessment crafted nine basic performance indicators
to be answered by all institutions involved in the project. The first step was
for us to create an inventory of everything we were doing across campus that
related to our first-year students. This is a substantial and informative list.
Then, using a list of all practices and programs, we set out to answer a set
of questions designed to determine how well we were doing and where we needed
to seek improvement. The nine performance indicators, which can link classroom
practices to such key efforts and goals as diversity and civic engagement, compel
foundation institutions to
- Approach the first year in ways that are intentional and based
on a philosophy of the first year that informs relevant campus
policies.
- Create organizational structures that provide a comprehensive,
integrated, and coordinated approach to the first year.
- Facilitate appropriate recruitment, admissions, and student
transitions through policies and practices that are intentional.
- Offer faculty development workshops that focus on teaching
first-year students.
- Serve all first-year students according to their diverse learning
needs.
- Provide first-year courses and out-of-classroom experiences
that include pedagogies of engagement.
- Ensure that students experience diverse worldviews.
- Encourage academic rigor.
- Assess and improve the first-year experience and contribute
to the national knowledge base on the first year.
Examining how well we accomplish these activities generates an
entire set of questions, which ultimately links back to program
improvement. Some things we already know. We know, for instance,
that students who are in course-linked courses report higher satisfaction
with their first-year experience and are more likely to be retained.
We know that if students are in a course link that includes a University
Life Course, they are even more likely to have a successful first
year. We know that those programs that practice the Seven
Principles are cited by the students as reasons for their success
and satisfaction. We know that civic engagement and service
learning contribute to student learning and student success.
Putting all of the pieces together is not a simple process. We have been
constructing and redesigning the complicated educational arch of the University
for decades, and we will continue to do so, using knowledge, data, and answers
to questions to craft a distinctive learning community. But the keystone to all
of our efforts is the Freshman-Year Experience Project, because it allows us
to evaluate systematically what at times have seemed to be separate activities:
the recruitment and retention of a diverse student body, the creation of programs
designed to attract and support high-achieving students, the expansion of service-learning
opportunities, the development of co-curricular programming in housing, and the
development of student athletic and leadership programs. These are all building
blocks, all learning focused, and their success depends on embracing the Seven
Principles.
One of the first actions of the Task Force on the Freshman-Year Experience
was to develop a philosophy of the First-Year Experience. The entire campus
has received a copy of that document, which underscores the fact that we can
intentionally help first-year students succeed. We subscribe to a broad definition
of success to include higher levels of academic, intellectual, cultural, social,
and civic engagement and personal development. To promote student success,
we will purposefully structure, restructure, and nurture learning environments
that facilitate the broad scope of student engagement. We invite you to learn
more about this effort and to become involved with your colleagues in expanding
and sustaining this important effort.
|