Notes from LMS II Committee Meeting
March 4, 2005 (written by Laura Sederberg)
In attendance: Bill Evans, Laura Sederberg, Brian Oppy, Mike Spiess, Phyllis Weddington, Brooke Banks, Steve Adams.
Minimum Requirements for LMS for us to consider:
· Accessibility requirements met
· PeopleSoft integration (demonstrated)
· Reliability/Stability 99.9%
· RDBS
· Track Record at large universities
· Easy to migrate courses and content
· Support Plan (affordable)
· Features list (Tools) at least what we have now
· Platforms, browsers, plug-ins adequate
· Backend realiability (No downtime)
· Disaster Recovery
· Solid course-level assessment
· Ease of Use (easier than now)
· Open Standard
· Extensibility (PowerLinks, Building Blocks)
Call Gartner Group for telephone-meeting during spring break (Brooke will arrange)
Talk to users (supporters) of Desire2Learn & Moodle. Do they meet all these criteria?
Desire2Learn not UNIX or LINUX but Windows server only?
Talk to Blackboard users (Pomona, Hayward, Long Beach, SF, SLO, Humboldt) about their experience and what version of Bb used.
Talk to WebCT users (UBC, Alberta, Georgia, Marshall, UNT) about their experience with Vista implementation.
In discussion about a scenario template, these questions came up.
We need to apply them to a template for writing up a summary
for Bill Post, suggestions from Bill Evans, as follows.
Five Main areas (four from our special sessions/groups and one more):