| LMS II Strategic Review: Pass/Fail Rubric | |||||
| Solutions that Pass Move to Next Phase | Vendor 1 | Vendor 2 | Vendor 3 | Vendor 4 | Vendor 5 |
| User-Level Requirements | |||||
| Accessibility -- 508 Compliant | |||||
| Availability -- 99.9% | |||||
| Ease of Use (better than current LMS) | |||||
| Features/Tools meet/exceed current set | |||||
| Course-level assessment tools available | |||||
| Platform, browsers, plug-ins (support includes Mac, PC) | |||||
| Supportability Requirements | |||||
| Chico Data Center technology standards -- compatible | |||||
| Demonstrated experience migrating courses from WebCT | |||||
| Disaster Recovery to time/point of failure | |||||
| Multi-year track record with comparable universities | |||||
| Open standards support, extensibility (PowerLinks, Building Blocks) | |||||
| PeopleSoft integration available and in use | |||||
| System Reliability (data integrity, RDBMS) | |||||
| Vendor Technical Support available -- same-day response | |||||
| Status (P for Pass; F for Fail) | |||||