Criteria for Review
1.1 Evidence

Criteria for Review
1.2 Evidence

Criteria for Review
1.3 Evidence

Criteria for Review
1.4 Evidence

Criteria for Review
1.5 evidence

Criteria for Review
1.6 Evidence

Criteria for Review
1.7 Evidence

Criteria for Review
1.8 Evidence

Criteria for Review 1.9

The institution is committed to honest and open communication with the Accrediting Commission, to undertaking the accreditation review process with seriousness and candor, and to abiding by Commission Policies and procedures, including all substantive change policies.

The California State University, Chico has been continuously accredited by the Western Association for Schools and Colleges, Commission for Senior Colleges and Universities, since 1949.   From 1949 to the present, CSU, Chico has maintained a professional, productive relationship with the Commission and looks forward to meeting its expected outcomes for the current reaccreditation effort.

Links to Evidence and Related Documents

The institution achieves its institutional purposes and attains its educational objectives through the core functions of teaching and learning, scholarship and creative activity, and support for student learning.  It demonstrates that these core functions are performed effectively and that they support one another in the institution's efforts to attain educational effectiveness.