Criteria for Review 2.6
The institution demonstrates that its graduates consistently achieve its stated levels of attainment and ensures that its expectations for student learning are embedded in the standards faculty use to evaluate student work.
Links to Evidence and Related Topics
General Education
- General Education review process (see Criteria 2.2)
- Assessment plans for courses available from Bitsy Wagner in office of VPAA for the last cycle of reviews of General Education areas, Upper Division Thematic and Upper Division Themes.
- NSSE
- Executive Memorandum 92-13: Revision to Grading Policy
- Comprehensive exams:
- MA in Education
- MA in Communication Studies
- MA in Political Science
- MA in Social Work
- Graduating Seniors Survey: College of Engineering, Computer Science, and Construction Management, CSU, Chico:
- Reported results for 2004-05
- Reported results for 2005-06 (in process)
- Survey sent to 2004 Baccalaureate Degree Recipients: Educational and Occupational Outcomes
Baccalaureate Programs
- Standards
- Syllabi: each department has a file of syllabi for courses; some syllabi have grading standards and expectations
- Some departmental web sites have syllabi and can use the campus syllabus template or create syllabus for Vista:
- All University Responsibility for Assessment (AURA)
- CA Department of Consumer Affairs Licensing Exams
- Other Licensing Exams:
- Attainment of subject matter competency for single and multiple subject teaching credentials
- Job placement rates:
Graduate Programs
- GRE results
- Students must maintain a 3.0 GPA; certain courses may require a minimum grade (e.g. a B)
- Probation and disqualification policy ensures that students perform at or above a 'B' grade level
- Expectations are clearly articulated in the university catalog
- Graduate syallbi