Criteria for Review 3.3

Faculty and staff recruitment, workload, incentive, and evaluation practices are aligned with institutional purposes and educational objectives.  Evaluation processes are systematic, include appropriate peer review, and, for instructional faculty and other teaching staff, involve consideration of evidence of teaching effectiveness, including student evaluations of instruction.

Links to Evidence and Related Topics

• CSU Profile of CSU Employees

• Faculty
  • Appointment Policies for Probationary Faculty  FPPP Section 6.1
  • Appointment Policies for Temporary Faculty FPPP Section 6.2
  • Assigned Weighted Teaching Units (AWTU) for 2001-2005
  • CBA
  • Class enrollment numbers
  • Collage Workload reports (WTU, AWTU) 
  • CPEC Salary Report
  • CSU Recruitment Reports
  • CSU Salary data
  • Department RTP Guidelines
  • Faculty Leaves, FPPP Section 9.1
  • General provisions for retention, tenure and promotion FPPP Section 8.5
  • General provisions for periodic evaluation  and performance review FPPP Section 8.0
  • Recruitment plans:
    • CSU, Chico
    • CSU system
  • Specific performance review procedures FPPP Section 8.5.b
  • Student Evaluation of Faculty FPPP Section 4.0
  • Workload report (CSU) and final recommendations
  • Workload report  - (CSU, Chico)  
• Staff
  • CSUEU contracts
  • Executive Management Evaluation and Development  Student Affairs - Personnel Evaluation forms
  • Fee Waiver Benefit Program
  • Human Resources
  • Human Resources Staff Development
  • In-Range Progression
  • Job Description Form
  • Policy and Procedures on Performance Salary Step Increases: EM 95-23  
  • Performance Evaluation Form
  • Staff Handbook
  • University Staff Development:
    • Survey data