Criteria for Review 4.4
The institution employs a deliberate set of quality assurance processes at each level of institutional functioning, including new curriculum and program approval
processes, periodic program review, ongoing evaluation, and data collection. These processes involve assessments of effectiveness, track results over time, and use the results of these
assessments to revise and improve structures and processes, curricula, and pedagogy.
Links to Evidence and Related Topics
Criteria to Review//csuchico/www/vpaa/wasc/cpr/CFRs4/CFR_4.1CFR_4.1Criteria for Review 4.1/4.1 EvidenceCriteria for Review//csuchico/www/vpaa/wasc/cpr/CFRs4/CFR_4.2CFR_4.2Criteria for Review 4.2/4.2 EvidenceCriteria for Review//csuchico/www/vpaa/wasc/cpr/CFRs4/CFR_4.3CFR_4.3Criteria for Review 4.3/4.3 EvidenceCriteria for Review//csuchico/www/vpaa/wasc/cpr/CFRs4/CFR_4.5CFR_4.5Criteria for Review 4.5/4.5 EvidenceCriteria for Review//csuchico/www/vpaa/wasc/cpr/CFRs4/CFR_4.6CFR_4.6Criteria for Review 4.6/4.6 EvidenceCriteria for Review//csuchico/www/vpaa/wasc/cpr/CFRs4/CFR_4.7CFR_4.7Criteria for Review 4.7/4.7 EvidenceCriteria for Review//csuchico/www/vpaa/wasc/cpr/CFRs4/CFR_4.8CFR_4.8Criteria for Review 4.8/4.8 Evidence