POLS 131 Introduction to Political Inquiry
Semester: Fall 2004
Section: 03
Class Time: Tuesday/Thursday 9:30-10:45am
Classroom: Butte Hall 104
Syllabus:
http://www.csuchico.edu/~ct65/syllabi/inquiryfall04.html
|
Instructor: Dr. Charles C. Turner
Email: ccturner@csuchico.edu
Phone: (530)898-5960(office)
Office: 741B Butte Hall
Office Hours: Tuesday 10:45-11:45am
Wednesday 1:00-4:00pm
Thursday 10:45-11:45am
(or by request) |
Scope
and Purpose
Political Science is a department/major/field of inquiry that is
in the College of Behavioral and Social Sciences here at Chico
State. And that's kind of what this class is all about.
First, we are going to read, think, talk, and write about how political
science is political. Then we will focus on how it is
scientific. Then we will look at how its approach to science is
both behavioral and social. The goal in all of
this is to gain a sense of perspective on what and how we learn in
political science. Sound confusing? Well, sometimes it
is. But, by the end of the semester you will be able to answer
with confidence those awkward questions from friends and family:
"why are you a political science major?" "what are you going to do
with that?" "So, you gonna be a politician?"
Throughout this course we will be focusing on five main learning
objectives. One, appreciating history--the study of politics
has a rich history. We will understand the present state of the
discipline better if we also pay attention to the past. Two,
surveying the landscape--political science is not a single,
narrowly defined subject. It's the systematic study of all things
political--from countries to cities to corporations. We will
appreciate it
more when we can see how all of its various subfields fit
together. Three, building a toolbox--like any scientific
discipline, the study of politics advances through the use of
methodological tools. Our discipline has developed an array of
strategies for proving claims through the use of evidence and
reasoning. We
need to recognize and practice using these tools. Four,
thinking
critically--not only do we need to know what's out there, we
also need to know how to think about it and evaluate it. Not all
political scientists come to the same conclusions about politics.
We need to make reasoned arguments about what we think and why. Five,
communicating effectively--mastering all of the previous objectives
won't get us very far if we can't communicate our knowledge and
reasoned opinions to others through clear and concise
communication. Practicing communication is the best way to
improve, so we will be talking
and listening and writing and reading about politics. If you
do your job well, by the end of this course you should have made
progress in each of these five areas and have developed a deeper
understanding of the broad field of political science.
We will be discussing a wide range of issues in this class.
Sometimes you will have questions: feel free to ask them.
Sometimes you will disagree with a classmate. Sometimes you will
disagree with me. That's okay! The political process is
about deliberation and reasonable people often disagree.
Disclaimer: Sometimes students use the words "hard" or
"boring" to describe a class or its assignments. If you find
yourself tempted to describe this class or its readings in such
a
manner, I'd ask you to consider three things. First,
education isn't always fun and it isn't always easy. You are
pursuing higher education by choice, because you want to improve your
mind, your skills, and your base of knowledge. If you start to
get frustrated, try telling yourself "I'm doing this to improve
myself."
That little refrain often helps me get through a round of sit-ups or
motivates me to take another lap around the track. Like physical
exercise, the results of mental exercise are not always immediately
apparent,
but by the end of the semester you will be able to look back to week
one
and realize that you have come a long way. Second, a lot
of
the learning that takes place in this course is conceptual. The
first step in this type of learning is often reading about a lot of new
things you've never encountered before. We have to take the
puzzle out of the box and start looking at the various pieces before we
can put it all together. The initial stages of puzzle solving are
often
frustrating, but the end result is worth the struggle. I don't
ask you to memorize a lot of facts, but I do ask you to develop an
understanding of political science as an academic discipline. Third,
this is an upper division writing proficiency course that is a
requirement for majors within the political science department.
It's the
only class fitting that description that you are likely to take in
college. Thus, you should not be surprised that we will have
readings and assignments unlike those you encountered in high school
or in other college classes. I know the course can be
challenging, but I also know that every one of you is capable of
success in this
class if you rise to meet that challenge.
Note: This is a writing proficiency (WP) course, open only to
students who have completed English 001 (Freshman Composition) with a
letter grade of C- or better (or its equivalent at another
institution). You have to receive a C- or better in this course
to graduate. Keep this in mind before engaging in any behavior
(like skipping class or failing to turn in assignments) that could
jeopardize your ability to pass the class.
Course
Readings
The following books are required for the course and are available at
the Associated Students Bookstore
(underlined titles are links to publisher
web pages--you are welcome to purchase the books from whatever source
you like):
Arendt, Hannah. 1994. Eichmann
in Jerusalem : A Report on the Banality of Evil. New York:
Penguin.
0-14-018765-0
Carlson, James M., and Mark S. Hyde. 2003. Doing Empirical Political Research.
Boston: Houghton Mifflin. 0-618-11672-9
Kuhn, Thomas S. 1996. The
Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 3rd edition. Chicago:
University of Chicago Press. 0-226-45808-3
These books will be supplemented with other readings. These
additional readings are available on the internet (see below) or via
distribution in class. You will need to access this syllabus on
the web on a regular basis in order to complete the readings and class
assignments.
Course Requirements and Grading (For the University grading guidelines, consult the University
Catalog.)
| Your grade for the course will be based on the following: |
These are the outcomes:
|
| briefs |
140 pts. |
35% |
| politics paper |
60 pts. |
15% |
| research proposal |
100 pts. |
25% |
| final exam |
60 pts. |
15% |
| participation |
40 pts. |
10% |
|
400 pts. |
100% |
|
|
A
|
372-400 pts. |
93-100% |
|
A-
|
360-372 |
90-92% |
|
B+
|
352-359 |
88-89% |
|
B
|
332-351 |
83-87% |
|
B-
|
320-331 |
80-82% |
|
C+
|
312-319 |
78-79% |
|
C
|
292-311 |
73-77% |
|
C-
|
280-291 |
70-72% |
|
D+
|
272-279 |
68-69% |
|
D
|
240-271 |
60-67% |
|
F
|
0-239 pts. |
59% and below |
|
Briefs: Over the course of the semester, you will be
writing 7 "briefs." I have given them this name
to indicate that they are fairly short (never more than 3
pages). I expect you to write clear, mechanically sound
sentences, and include source citation. Your task is to clearly
answer the question
at hand based on the week's readings (or another source when indicated
below). You may bring these briefs to class, ready to turn in,
on the day they are due, or you may choose to revise them based on
class discussion and turn them in by 4pm on Friday of the week they are
due. We will frequently use them as a starting point for
class
discussions. They are worth 20 points each.
Politics Paper: At the end of week 5, you will turn in
a
3-4 page paper that addresses some of the broad questions from the
first
part of this course (see the description of topics below). The
central
focus of the paper should be the Arendt book, and you should explicitly
discuss and cite arguments and examples from that text, but other
readings
can be incorporated as well. We will discuss this paper in more
detail
in class. It is worth 60 points.
Research Proposal: Your crowning achievement in this
class will be a 10-15 page research proposal. This paper will
bring you to the very brink of conducting your own political
inquiry. Your research proposal will look very much like a
journal article, except that you will not be collecting and testing
data. Your paper will include the selection of an appropriate
research topic, the
development of a research question, a review of the literature on
this topic, a testable hypothesis, and a discussion of methods and
possible
conclusions. You will be writing this paper in several stages,
as indicated below, with the final product due at the end of week
15.
This project is worth 100 points. You will need to get started
early on this project in order to have time to locate the books and
articles
you will need. As you are turning in the research
proposal
in several stages (listed as steps one, two, three, four, and five),
you
should view this assignment as an opportunity to revise and improve
upon
your writing. Failure to turn in steps 1-4 on time will result in
5 point deductions on the Research Proposal. To get a sense for
what your paper should be like, have a look at these: sample
paper #1 and sample
paper #2 and sample
paper #3 and sample paper #4. Warning:
the sample papers
are not perfect. We will discuss their strengths and weaknesses
in class.
Final Exam: During finals week, we will take a final
exam worth 60 points. The exam will consist of
identification/short answer and essay questions. It will be
comprehensive. You will receive a study guide for the exam.
Participation: Come to class; it is hard to participate if
you are
not here! 10% (40 points) of your grade is based on participation
because I want to reward you for taking an active role in your
education. I also want to encourage you to come to class, pay
attention, answer questions, and join in class discussions. More
than three absences over the course of the semester will result in
serious damage to your participation grade. I will call on you to
answer questions. I'm not expecting "right" answers--sometimes
there isn't a right answer; I am expecting thoughtful and intelligent
answers that demonstrate you have done the reading and are paying
attention. Additionally, pop quizzes, in-class writing
assignments, and other in-class activities will become part of your
participation grade when employed.
Other Details
You must make arrangements with the instructor ahead of time if you
cannot attend a class session or complete an assignment on time. Late
assignments will be assessed a full one letter grade penalty (10%) for
each class
period they are late. Steps of the Research Proposal
must be turned in on time, or face a 5 point deduction.
Students are expected to complete their
own work. Academic
dishonesty will result in a zero on the
assignment and formal charges with Student
Judicial Affairs. For questions or concerns about plagiarism,
please ask me or consult the University Catalog's
section on Academic
Honesty and the University's Policy on
Academic Integrity. An additional useful resource is
Appendix 1 in your Carlson & Hyde textbook.. If you are unhappy
with a grade you receive on an
assignment, do not understand my comments, or believe that I have
mis-interpreted your writing, come talk to me. It is always
possible that I have erred. This syllabus is subject to change and/or
revision during the academic term. Reasonable alternative
assignments will be developed for students with documented learning
disabilities. Turn off cell phones, pagers, and other distracting
devices during class. If your cell phone rings during class you
will be expected to leave the classroom for the remainder of the period.
If you have a documented disability that may require reasonable
accommodation, please contact Disability Support Services (DSS) for
coordination of your academic accommodations. DSS is located in
Building E, adjacent to Meriam Library and
Bell Memorial Union (BMU). The DSS phone number is 898-5959 V/TDD
or Fax 898-4411. Visit the DSS Web site at http://www.csuchico.edu/dss/
Since this course is designated as the Writing Proficiency course
for political
science, you are encouraged to take advantage of Chico State's University Writing Center, or
the Student Learning Center
(4th floor of the Meriam Library). Indeed, there are writing
assignments every week, so you should look at this class as
an opportunity to enhance your writing skills. I will provide
written feedback on your assignments and will discuss general
observations about aspects of writing that the class as a whole needs
to focus on during class lectures. Writing well is a lifelong
learning process, so don't feel like you have to be a "bad" writer to
take advantage of student writing services, or that there is no need
for
help once you are a "good" writer. There is always room for
improvement!
Also, if you do not already own one, a writing guide/manual is an
invaluable tool. Our library has several
print examples and several web sites
that provide citation guides. Some good print examples are:
Hacker, Diana. A Writer's
Reference. Fourth Edition, St. Martin's Press. 1999.
Lunsford, Andrea, and Robert Connors. EasyWriter:
A Pocket Guide. Bedford/St.Martin's Press. 1998.
Scott, Gregory M., and Stephen M. Garrison. The Political Science
Student Writer's Manual. Fourth Edition, Prentice Hall. 2002.
Strunk, William, Jr. Elements of Style.
You should also print out a copy of the CSU,
Chico Department of Political Science Quick Reference Guide for
Research Papers and Reports, by Diane E. Schmidt. This
document details the departmental writing standards for political
science.
Semester
Schedule
- Part 1: Politics
- Week 1,
August 24, 26
- Introduction of class and syllabus
- How do we ask questions about politics and what can we know?
- reading: Carlson & Hyde chapter 1
- Week 2,
August 31
- Defining Terms: what is politics? what
is political science?
- reading: Carlson & Hyde chapter 1, read activities on
p.16-17 (we will discuss in class), Appendix 1
- No class on September 2nd,
but your first brief is still due!
- brief #1: find a definition of politics (any source
is fine), type it down (everything you turn in for this
class should be typed), provide the appropriate citation, read and
print out Chico State's Policy on Academic Integrity,
sign it to indicate that you
understand what plagiarism is, staple these two things together and
turn them in by Friday at 4pm to my mailbox in the department office.
- Week 3,
September 7, 9
- brief #2: what distinguishes the ancient from the modern
when it comes to political questions? Write a 1 page
response to this question using examples from Plato and
Machiavelli.
- The
White-Tailed Hornet, a poem by Robert Frost.
- Week 4,
September 14, 16
- Contemporary Political Questions: coping with an unclothed
emperor (Nietzsche and Marx)
- reading: Arendt chapters 1-3
- Contemporary Political Questions: nationalism, racism, and
the aftermath of World War II
- reading: Arendt chapters 4-6
- brief #3: discuss 3 important questions in
contemporary politics and some possible answers (about 1 paragraph
each). Write a 1
page response to this question using at least one example from
this week's readings. Bring your completed
paper to class on Thursday. You will be exchanging papers
as part of a writing exercise.
- Week 5,
September 21, 23
- Politics and Responsibility: evil, morality, and
limitations on government power
- reading: Arendt chapters 7-end (especially 10 and 14-end,
including the Epilogue and Postscript)
- Evaluating the Scope of Political Science
- politics paper: Write a 3-4 page paper on one
of the following sets of questions (or another question, selected in
consultation with the professor):
- What is "the banality of evil" and what problems does it
create for the study of politics? What sorts of questions does it
force contemporary political scientists to address and how do these
questions compare to those faced by earlier political thinkers?
Critically compare and contrast the political decisions made by
Eichmann and by the Danish Government and evaluate their political
responsibility.
- Although political "science" is supposed to
be nonnormative, the scope of politics includes some important
normative questions: What are appropriate and inappropriate
ends (purposes) of the state? Who should get to decide?
What is the just punishment for Adolph Eichmann? Who should
to decide? What is genocide ("crimes against humanity") and how does
its emergence in the twentieth century challenge the scope of politics?
- Part 2: Political Science as a Behavioral/Social Science
- Week 6, September 28, 30
- Clouds, Clocks and the Measurement of Human Behavior:
Using the Scientific Method
- reading: Carlson & Hyde chapter 2
- Defining Science: what is a science and what makes
political science one?
- reading: Kuhn Preface and chapters 1-2. You
may also find this study guide
helpful. It was carefully prepared by Professor Frank Pajares of
Emory
University.
- brief #4: find a definition of "science" and a
definition of "political science" and include both of these definitions
in a 1 page analysis that describes why and how political science can
be referred to as a science.
- Week 7,
October 5, 7
- Scientific Revolutions: normal science and how we learn
within a discipline
- reading: Kuhn chapters 3-5, and chapter 13.
- Scientific Revolutions: paradigms and revolutions
- reading: handouts you will receive on Tuesday
- brief #5: what are revolutions like in the world of
political science? In a 2 page analysis, explain how the
articles you were given fit within the Kuhnian framework of paradigms,
normal science, and revolution.
- Week 8, October 12, 14
- Formulating Scientific Research
- reading: Carlson & Hyde chapter 3
- Finding Literature: What do we already know?
- reading: Carlson & Hyde chapter 4
- On October 14 we will be going to the library to
discuss strategies for researching political science literature and for
Choosing
and Citing Political Science Sources. You will want to start browsing
some political science journals to get started thinking about your
research proposal.
- brief #6, part 1: pick a scholarly, peer-reviewed political
science journal article that looks interesting to you and is at least 14 pages long, make
a
photocopy and bring it to class, turn in the citation information and a
concise,
1 paragraph description of the article. It will be in your best
interest to avoid political theory and law review articles for this
assignment. Also, you may not use the journals PS or Foreign Affairs. Attach a
copy of the
article to brief #6.
- Week 9,
October 19, 21
- How to Read Political Science Research
- reading: Carlson & Hyde chapter 5 & 6
- Designing and Assessing Relationships: variables and
hypotheses
- reading: Carlson & Hyde chapter 6
- brief #6, part 2: turn in a 2-3 page paper that
analyzes strengths and weaknesses of the research design employed in a
political science journal article that you selected. You will
turn in a copy of the journal article with your paper. We will
discuss appropriate
peer-reviewed journals and articles in class. (This chart
will also help.) You must employ the following four terms in your
analysis: causation, hypothesis, independent variable,
dependent variable. You must also use two additional terms from
the lists of key terms at the end of Chapter 6. Staple a copy of
the journal article to the back of your
paper.
- Week 10,
October 26, 28
- Conceptualizing, Operationalizing, and Measuring Variables
- reading: Carlson & Hyde chapter 7
- The Research Problem: Designing our own research
- reading: review Carlson & Hyde pages 28-37, 44-49, and
chapter 6
- brief #7: Hypothesis Quiz. This will be
distributed on Tuesday and will need to be turned in on Friday.
- Week 11, November 2, 4
- No class this week. Individual meetings with professor
to discuss progress/final project
- Sign up for an appointment time and come with step one,
prepared to discuss the direction of your research proposal.
- research proposal, step one: at the time of your
individual appointment, turn in a one paragraph description of the
topic area or research problem you want to pursue in your research
proposal. Be specific--identify a causal relationship and a
hypothesis. Your topic should be
narrow enough for an individual researcher to pursue--something you
can find 10 books or articles on, not 10,000. (Remember, failure to
turn
in a step of the proposal on time will result in a 5 point
deduction on your Research Proposal.)
- Week 12,
November 9, 11
- Reviewing Literature
- reading: Carlson & Hyde chapters 4 & 5
- Reflections on Finding and Reviewing Literature
- research proposal, step two: turn in an
annotated bibliography of at least 10 sources and a topic outline of
your research proposal. (Remember, failure to turn in a step of
the proposal on time will result in a 5 point deduction on your
Research Proposal.)
- Week 13,
November 16, 18
- Collecting and Analyzing Data
- reading: Carlson & Hyde chapter 8
- Choosing Your Method: the varieties of data analysis
- reading: Carlson & Hyde chapters 9-12 (focusing on
the approach you want to take in your research proposal)
- research proposal, step three:
turn in a 1 page discussion of how you plan to collect data for your
research project. Keep in mind that you are writing a proposal for research to be done in
the future, so feel free to think big. Include details on sources
you will use and problems
you might encounter. You should treat this step as a rough draft for
the data section of your research proposal. (Remember, failure
to turn in a step of the proposal on time will result
in a 5 point deduction on your Research Proposal.)
- No class November 22-26, Thanksgiving Break!
- Writing Your Research Proposal
- reading: Carlson & Hyde chapter 18, read
the sample papers, reread Appendix 1
- Peer Review: learning from your classmates
- Bring a rough draft of your
paper to class on Thursday. We will spend time critiquing
each other's work
- research proposal, step four: turn in a rough
draft of your paper. This should include a framing of the issue,
a specific research question, at least an outline of the
literature review, a tentative hypothesis, and some thoughts on how you
could test this hypothesis. (Remember, failure to turn in a step
of the proposal on time will result in a 5 point deduction
on your Research Proposal.)
- Week 15,
December 7, 9
- Revising Writing
- Our topics this week will be based on what we need to spend
more time with.
- research proposal, step five: the final
product! Turn in your 10-15 page proposal on the last day of
class. Staple steps 1, 2, 3, and 4 (the ones I have commented on
and returned to you) to the back of the final product.
- Finals Week, December 13-17
- Final Exam: Tuesday, December 14, 12:00-1:50pm
Additional
Resources
page last updated 2 August 2004.