POLS 221A Introduction to Political Inquiry
Semester: Spring 2001
Section: 01 or 02
Class Time: 01: M/W/F 9:00-9:50am
02: Tuesday/Thursday 3:30-4:45pm
Classroom: 01: Butte Hall 321
02: Butte Hall 201
Syllabus: http://www.csuchico.edu/~ct65/syllabi/politicalinquiry.html |
Instructor: Dr. Charles C. Turner
Email: ccturner@csuchico.edu
Phone: (530)898-5199 (office) or (530)895-8076 (home)
Office: 745 Butte Hall
Office Hours: M/W/F 10am-noon (or by request) |
Scope and Purpose
Political Science is a department/major/field of inquiry that's
in the College of Behavioral and Social Sciences here at Chico State.
And that's kind of what this class is all about. First, we are going
to read, think, talk, and write about how political science is political.
Then we will focus on how it is scientific. Then we will look at
how its approach to science is both behavioral and social. The goal
in all of this is to gain a sense of perspective on what and how we learn
in political science. Sound confusing? Well, sometimes it is.
But, by the end of the semester you will be able to answer with confidence
those awkward questions from friends and family: "why are you a political
science major?" "what are you going to do with that?" "So,
you're gonna be a politician?"
Throughout this course we will be focusing on five main objectives.
One,
appreciating history--the study of politics has a rich history.
We will understand the present state of the discipline better if we also
pay attention to the past. Two, surveying the landscape--political
science is not a single, narrowly defined subject. It's the systematic
study of all things political--from countries to cities to corporations.
We will appreciate it more when we can see how all of its various subfields
fit together. Three, building a toolbox--like any scientific
discipline, the study of politics advances through the use of methodological
tools. Our discipline has developed an array of strategies for proving
claims through the use of evidence and reasoning. We need to recognize
and practice using these tools. Four, thinking critically--not
only do we need to know what's out there, we also need to know how to think
about it and evaluate it. Not all political scientists come to the
same conclusions about politics. We need to make reasoned arguments
about what we think and why. Five, communicating effectively--mastering
all of the previous objectives won't get us very far if we can't communicate
our knowledge and reasoned opinions to others through clear and concise
communication. Practicing communication is the best way to improve,
so we will be talking and listening and writing and reading about politics.
If I do my job well, and you do your job well, by the end of this course
you should have made progress in each of these five areas and have developed
a deeper understanding of your chosen major field.
We will be discussing a wide range of issues in this class. Sometimes
you will have questions: feel free to ask them. Sometimes you
will disagree with a classmate. Sometimes you will disagree with
me. That's okay! The political process is about deliberation
and reasonable people often disagree.
Course Readings
The following books are required for the course and are available at the
Associated
Students Bookstore (underlined titles are links to publisher web pages--you
are welcome to purchase the books from whatever source you like):
Arendt, Hannah. Eichmann
in Jerusalem : A Report on the Banality of Evil. (New York: Penguin,
1994) 0-14-018765-0
Kuhn, Thomas S. The
Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 3rd edition. (Chicago: University
of Chicago Press, 1996) 0-226-45808-3
Schelling, Thomas C. Micromotives
and Macrobehavior. (New York: Norton, 1978) 0-393-09009-4
Tinder, Glenn. Political
Thinking: The Perennial Questions, 6th edition. (New York: Longman,
1996) 0-673-99389-2
Jones, Laurence F., and Edward C. Olson. Political
Science Research: A Handbook of Scope and Methods. (New York:
Longman, 1996) 0-06-501637-8
These books will be supplemented with reading from other sources.
These additional readings are available on the internet (see below).
You will need to access this syllabus on the web on a regular basis in
order to complete the readings and other class assignments.
Course
Requirements and Grading
For the University grading guidelines, consult the University
Catalog.
| Your grade for the course will be based on the following: |
These are the outcomes:
|
| briefs |
80 pts. |
20% |
| politics paper |
60 pts. |
15% |
| research design |
60 pts. |
15% |
| research proposal |
100 pts. |
25% |
| final exam |
60 pts. |
15% |
| participation |
40 pts. |
10% |
|
400 pts. |
100% |
|
|
A
|
372-400 pts. |
93-100% |
|
A-
|
360-372 |
90-92% |
|
B+
|
352-359 |
88-89% |
|
B
|
332-351 |
83-87% |
|
B-
|
320-331 |
80-82% |
|
C+
|
312-319 |
78-79% |
|
C
|
292-311 |
73-77% |
|
C-
|
280-291 |
70-72% |
|
D+
|
272-279 |
68-69% |
|
D
|
240-271 |
60-67% |
|
F
|
0-239 pts. |
59% and below |
|
Briefs: Over the course of the semester, you will be writing
8 "briefs." I have given them this name to indicate both that they
are fairly short (never more than 3 pages) and that the style and tone
are somewhat less formal than the traditional "paper." Your task
is to clearly answer the question at hand based on the week's readings
(or another source when indicated below). You should bring these
briefs to class, ready to turn in, on the day they are due. We will
frequently use them as a starting point for class discussions. They
are worth 10 points each.
Politics Paper: At the end of week 4, you will turn in
a 4-5 page paper that addresses some of the broad questions from the first
part of this course. The central focus of the paper should be the
Arendt book, but other readings can be incorporated as well. We will
discuss this paper in more detail in class. It is worth 60 points.
Research Design Paper: At the end of week 8, you will have
the opportunity to show off what you've learned about research design by
writing a 4-5 page paper that analyzes strengths and weaknesses of the
research design employed in a political science journal article that you
select. You will turn in a copy of the journal article with your
paper. We will discuss appropriate
journals and articles in class. This assignment is worth 60 points.
Research Proposal: Your crowning achievement in this class
will be a 10-15 page research proposal. This paper will bring you
to the very brink of conducting your own political inquiry. It will
include the selection of an appropriate research topic, the development
of a research question, a review of the literature on this topic, and a
testable hypothesis. You will be writing this paper in several stages,
as indicated below, with the final product due at the end of week 16.
This project is worth 100 points. You will need to get started
early on this project in order to have time to locate the books and articles
you will need.
Final Exam: During finals week, we will take a final exam
worth 60 points. The exam will consist of identification/short answer
and essay questions. It will be comprehensive.
Participation: Come to class; it is hard to participate if you
are not here! 10% (40 points) of your grade is based on participation because
I want to reward you for taking an active role in your education.
I also want to encourage you to come to class, pay attention, answer questions,
and join in class discussions. More than three absences over the
course of the semester will result in serious damage to your participation
grade. I will call on you to answer questions. I'm not expecting
"right" answers--sometimes there isn't a right answer; I am expecting thoughtful
and intelligent answers that demonstrate you have done the reading and
are paying attention. Additionally, pop quizzes, in-class writing
assignments, and other in-class activities will become part of your participation
grade.
Other
Details
You must make arrangements with the instructor ahead of time if you
cannot attend a class session or complete an assignment on time. Late
assignments will be assessed a one letter grade penalty for each class
period they are late. Students are expected to complete their
own
work. Academic dishonesty will result in a zero on the assignment,
and possible further disciplinary action. For questions or concerns
about plagiarism, please ask me or consult the University
Catalog's section on Academic
Honesty. If you are unhappy with a grade you receive on
an assignment, do not understand my comments, or believe that I have mis-interpreted
your writing, come talk to me. It is always possible that I have
erred. This syllabus is subject to change and/or revision during the academic
term. Reasonable alternative assignments will be developed for students
with documented learning disabilities. No cell phones. No beepers.
No pagers.
Since this course is designated as the Writing Proficiency course for
political science, you are encouraged to take advantage of Chico State's
Writing
Center (Taylor Hall, 203). Indeed, there are writing assignments
every week, so you should look at this class as an opportunity to enhance
your writing skills. Writing well is a lifelong learning process,
so don't feel like you have to be a "bad" writer to take advantage of student
writing services, or that there is no need for help once you are a "good"
writer. There is always room for improvement! Also, if you
do not already own one, a writing guide/manual is an invaluable tool.
Some good examples are:
Hacker, Diana. A
Writer's Reference. Fourth Edition, St. Martin's Press. 1999.
Lunsford, Andrea, and Robert Connors. EasyWriter:
A Pocket Guide. Bedford/St.Martin's Press. 1998.
Schmidt, Diane. Writing
in Political Science: A Practical Guide. Second Edition,
Addison, Wesley, Longman. 2000.
Scott, Gregory M., and Stephen M. Garrison. The
Political Science Student Writer's Manual. Third Edition, Prentice
Hall. 2000.
Strunk, William, Jr. Elements
of Style.
You should also print out a copy of the CSU,
Chico Department of Political Science Quick Reference Guide for Research
Papers and Reports, by Diane E. Schmidt.
Semester Schedule
-
Part 1: Politics
-
Week 1, January 22-26
-
Introduction of class and syllabus
-
Defining Terms: what is politics? what is political research?
-
reading: Jones & Olson chapter 1
-
brief #1: find a definition of politics (any source is fine), type
it down (everything you turn in for this class should be typed), bring
it to class.
-
Week 2, January 29-February 2
Machiavelli's The Prince, chapter
xv
and chapter xviii
-
brief #2: what distinguishes the ancient from the modern when it comes
to political questions? Write a 1 page response to this question
using examples from Aristotle and Machiavelli.
-
Week 3, February 5-9
-
Contemporary Political Questions: coping with an unclothed emperor (Nietzsche
and Marx)
-
reading: Tinder questions 6 and 7
-
Contemporary Political Questions: nationalism, racism, and the aftermath
of World War II
-
reading: Arendt chapters 1-6
-
brief #3: what are 3 big questions of contemporary politics and what
are some possible answers? Write a 1 page response to this question
using examples from this week's readings
-
Week 4, February 12-16
-
Politics and Responsibility: evil, morality, and limitations on government
power
-
reading: Tinder questions 18, 19, and 25, Arendt chapters 7-end (especially
14-end)
-
Evaluating the Scope of Political Science
-
politics paper: Write a 4-5 page paper on one of the following sets
of questions (or another question, selected in consultation with the professor):
-
What is "the banality of evil" and what problems does it create for the
study of politics? What sorts of questions does it force contemporary
political scientists to address and how do these questions compare to those
faced by earlier political thinkers?
-
Although political "science" is supposed to be nonnormative, the scope
of politics includes some important normative questions: What are
appropriate and inappropriate ends of the state? Who gets to decide?
What is the proper punishment for Adolph Eichmann? Who gets to decide?
Compare and contrast the political decisions made by Eichmann and by the
Danish Government.
-
Part 2: Science
-
Week 5, February 19-23
-
Defining Science: what is a science and what makes political science
one?
-
reading: reread Jones & Olson chapter 1
-
Defining and Describing Political Science
-
reading: Jones & Olson chapter 4
-
brief #4: find a definition of "science" and a definition of "political
science" and write a 1 page analysis that explains how and to what extent
the latter is a subset of the former.
-
Week 6, February 26-March 2
-
Scientific Revolutions: normal science and how we learn within a discipline
-
reading: Kuhn Preface and chapters 1-3
-
Week 7, March 5-9
-
Formulating Scientific Research
-
reading: Jones & Olson chapter 9
-
Measuring Stuff: reliability, validity, and "proof" in political
science
-
reading: Jones & Olson chapter 10
-
brief #6: pick a political
science journal article that looks interesting to you, make a photocopy
and bring it to class, turn in the citation information and a brief, 1
paragraph description of the article.
-
Week 8, March 12-16
-
Research Designs: useful answers depend upon well-designed questions
-
reading: Jones & Olson chapter 11
-
Critiquing Research Designs
-
research design paper: turn in a 4-5 page paper that analyzes strengths
and weaknesses of the research design employed in the political science
journal article that you selected. Staple a copy of the journal article
to the back of your paper.
-
Week 9, March 19-23
-
Part 3: Political Science as a Behavioral/Social Science
-
Week 10, March 26-30
-
Clouds, Clocks and the Measurement of Human Behavior
-
reading: Schelling chapter 1
-
Models in the Social Sciences
-
reading: Schelling chapters 2-4, play The
Prisoner's Dilemma, check out a diffusion
model of interracial hostility
-
brief #7: how do models help us explain political behavior? In a
2 page writing, explain how one of the models we've discussed can be adapted
to help us understand politics.
-
Week 11, April 2-6
-
The Divisions of Political Science: Subfields
-
reading: Jones & Olson chapters 5-8 (you only have to read one,
but you are welcome to read more)
-
choose a subfield that sounds interesting and start thinking about a specific
question or topic that intrigues you
-
The Research Problem
-
reading: Jones & Olson chapter 2
-
research proposal, step one: turn in a one paragraph description
of the topic area or research problem you want to pursue in your research
proposal. Be specific. It should be something you can find
10 books or articles on, not 10,000.
-
Week 12, April 9-13
-
Reviewing Literature
-
reading: Jones & Olson chapter 3
-
Reflections on Finding and Reviewing Literature
-
research proposal, step two: turn in an annotated bibliography and
a topic outline of your research proposal
-
Week 13, April 16-20
-
No class this week. Individual meetings with professor to discuss
progress/final project
-
Sign up for an appointment time and come prepared to discuss the direction
of your research proposal
-
Week 14, April 23-27
-
Collecting and Analyzing Data
-
reading: Jones & Olson chapter 13
-
brief #8: turn in a 1 page discussion of how you would collect data
if you were actually carrying out the research proposal you are writing
about. Include details on sources you might use and problems you
might encounter. (Some of the information in this brief should become a
part of your research proposal).
-
Week 15 April 30-May 4
-
Writing Your Research Proposal
-
reading: Jones & Olson chapter 16
-
research proposal, step three: turn in a draft of the first few paragraphs/pages
of your paper. This should include a framing of the issue, a specific
research question, at least an outline of the literature review, a tentative
hypothesis, and some thoughts on how you could test this hypothesis.
-
Week 16, May 7-11
-
Finals Week, May 14-18
-
Final for Section 01: Monday, 10:00-11:50am
-
Final for Section 02: Thursday, 2:00-3:50pm
page last updated 21 December 2000.