[This page printed from http://www.csuchico.edu/~curban/VariousEvaluationData.html]
13 September 2004 (1)
VARIOUS EVALUATION DATA:
The computerized summary of data available in the College of Behavioral and Sciences for the various evaluations (SET, Student Evaluation of Teaching, spring 2001-2004) and SIR, Student Instructional Report, spring 2000] indicates that students regard me as a "Superior" or "Very Good" teacher. In SET-Part I, students were asked to respond to ten statements as follows: "Strongly Agree, Agree, Neither Agree nor Disagree, Strongly Disagree, or Does Not Apply." Clearly, the majority of students for all three courses responded with "Strongly Agree" [SA], or "Agree" [A] for statements 1->10. The statements were: #1: The syllabus explains course requirements; #2: My overall knowledge of the subject matter has increased due to the instruction of this course; #3: The instructor presents the material in an understandable way; #4: The instructor is well prepared for class; #5: The instructor follows the course syllabus; #6: The instructor is available during office hours; #7: The course assignments contribute to learning; #8: The instructor gives appropriate feedback; #9: The instructor communicates high expectations for student achievement; and #10: The instructor monitors student learning throughout the course.
Spring 2004:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1.... Syll / Course Req. |
|
|
|
|
#2....Overall knowledge |
|
|
|
|
#3....Instructor / material |
|
|
|
|
#4....Inst. well-prepared |
|
|
|
|
#5....Inst. folllows syll. |
|
|
|
|
#6....Inst. avail. Off. Hours |
|
|
|
|
#7....Assignments / Learn. |
|
|
|
|
#8....Inst. gives Feedback |
|
|
|
|
#9....Comm. High Expectations |
|
|
|
|
#10...Inst. Monitors St Learning |
|
|
|
Spring 2003:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1.... Syll / Course Req. |
|
|
|
|
#2....Overall knowledge |
|
|
|
|
#3....Instructor / material |
|
|
|
|
#4....Inst. well-prepared |
|
|
|
|
#5....Inst. folllows syll. |
|
|
|
|
#6....Inst. avail. Off. Hours |
|
|
|
|
#7....Assignments / Learn. |
|
|
|
|
#8....Inst. gives Feedback |
|
|
|
|
#9....Comm. High Expectations |
|
|
|
|
#10...Inst. Monitors St Learning |
|
|
|
Spring 2002:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1.... Syll / Course Req. |
|
|
|
|
#2....Overall knowledge |
|
|
|
|
#3....Instructor / material |
|
|
|
|
#4....Inst. well-prepared |
|
|
|
|
#5....Inst. folllows syll. |
|
|
|
|
#6....Inst. avail. Off. Hours |
|
|
|
|
#7....Assignments / Learn. |
|
|
|
|
#8....Inst. gives Feedback |
|
|
|
|
#9....Comm. High Expectations |
|
|
|
|
#10...Inst. Monitors St Learning |
|
|
|
Spring 2001:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1.... Syll / Course Req. |
|
|
|
|
#2....Overall knowledge |
|
|
|
|
#3....Instructor / material |
|
|
|
|
#4....Inst. well-prepared |
|
|
|
|
#5....Inst. folllows syll. |
|
|
|
|
#6....Inst. avail. Off. Hrs. |
|
|
|
|
#7....Assignments / Learn. |
|
|
|
|
#8....Inst. gives Feedback |
|
|
|
|
#9....Comm. High Expec. |
|
|
|
|
#10...Inst. Monitors St Le |
|
|
|
Spring 2000:
Summarizing SIR [Student Instructional Report] Data indicates that students view me as effective to very effective and the following provides my Mean Spring 2000 SIR II Sub-Scale Student Evaluations, with a Range from 1 (Ineffective) to 5 (Very Effective), relative to Anthropology and BSS.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
A. |
Course Organization & Planning |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. |
Communication |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. |
Faculty Student Interaction |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. |
Assignments, Exams, & Grades |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. |
Supplemental Instructional Mtrls. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F. |
Course Outcomes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. |
Student Effort & Involvement |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
H. |
Course Difficulty |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I. |
OVERALL EVALUATION |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Setting the CSU, Chio Anthropology Department at 1.00, the following appears:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
A. |
Course Organizaiont & Planning |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. |
Communication |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. |
Faculty Student Interaction |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. |
Assignments, Exams, & Grades |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. |
Supplemental Instructional Mtrls. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F. |
Course Outcomes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. |
Student Effort & Involvement |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
H. |
Course Difficulty |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I. |
OVERALL EVALUATION |
|
|
|
|
|
|
# # #
(1) Statistical data (including
class size, location & times, for all of the classes above
information) has been extracted from the following web pages:
http://www.csuchico.edu/~curban/FARFall2004.html
(for 7/1/2003 to 6/30/2004), http://www.csuchico.edu/~curban/FARFall2003.html
(for 7/1/2002 to 6/30/2003), http://www.csuchico.edu/~curban/FARFall2002.html
(7/1/2001 to 6/30/2002), http://www.csuchico.edu/~curban/FARFall2001.html
(for 7/1/2000 to 6/30/2001), as well as FAR/FMI
[Faculty Merit Increase] information submitted on October 2,
2000 (for 7/1/1999 to 6/30/2000). To return to the beginning of
these pages, please click here.
to California State University, Chico.
[This page printed from http://www.csuchico.edu/~curban/VariousEvaluationData.html]
~1,280 words} 13 September 2004
Copyright © 2004; all rights reserved by Charles F. Urbanowicz |
13 September 2004 by cfu |