History 1C: Lecture 17

End of Empires, Africa

I. Africa

In Africa the rise of nationalism and colonial revolution was even more dramatic than in Asia. Triumph of nationalism in Asia was not surprising given their long history of isolation, ancient cultures, and local political organizations that had been agitating for some decades. In Africa by contrast, nationalist movements were much younger and weaker. Also the continent had not been jarred and aroused by Japanese invasion and occupation. And yet, just as the first post war decade witnessed the liberation of Asia, so the second witnessed the liberation of Africa. During that decade, no fewer than 31 African countries won their independence. The course of this nationalist awakening differed fundamentally from region to region because of historical backgrounds. Here we will consider the colonial revolutions of North and South Africa.

A. South Africa

The colony of South Africa was established by the Dutch but came under British rule in 1814. The Dutch farmers, or Boers, rejected British rule and trekked northward where they established independent states. With the discovery of gold and diamonds in these republics in the 1880s the British tried to annex them. The resulting BOER WAR (1899-1902) ended with the Boers accepting British rule. In 1909 South Africa became a self-governing dominion in the British Commonwealth.

A little more than 50 years later, in 1961, South Africa left the commonwealth to become an independent republic. Main reason for separation was clash between South Africa and new African and Asian commonwealth members over the issue of APARTHEID.

1. APARTHEID= 2 policies: the exclusion of all non-whites from any participation in political life; and the confinement of all Africans into separate areas known as BANTUSTANS (or preserves for the Bantus). These Bantustans comprised only 14% of all African land but Africans made up 73.8% of Africa's total population of 31.7 million (in 1984). By contrasts, the whites made up only 14.8% and Afrikaners comprised only 3\5 of the white minority.

2.AFRIKANER minority controlled South Africa partly because parliamentary representation was weighted in their favor and also because many English-speaking whites supported apartheid for economic reasons. This was especially true of white labor, which feared competition from non-whites if they were given equal opportunities.

3. Apartheid was not a viable program economically nor politically but it was preserved in South Africa for so long because the South African government possessed the strongest military on the African continent and did not hesitate to use force in quelling African nationalist uprisings:

--Mass killings at townships of Sharpeville (1960) and Soweto (1976)

--By 1980 apartheid became unworkable--tidal wave of external and internal opposition most notable angry your Africans who were alienated and were willing to do anything to destroy apartheid.

--Black trade unions--most important pockets of opposition used their organizational strength in political struggle against apartheid. Resulting turmoil forced business leaders to meet with leaders of the banned African National congress and businessmen to call for an end to Ap.

--Foreign sanctions against SA: America adopts economic sanctions in 1985. All above forced Botha to resign in 1989.

4. Botha's strategy rested on military might, his successor, de Klerk tried to find middle road between African demand for "one person one vote" with Afrikaners' "never".

--1990 he legalized the African National Congress and released its leader, Nelson Mandella, from prison where he had been incarcerated for 28 years.

--Four-day free elections based on universal suffrage in 1994--Mandela's African Congress won over 62% of the vote. Appears to be a peaceful and successful transition from apart.

B. North Africa

As in Indochina, the French fought long and hard to maintain their colonies--tremendous number of french settlers in the area (Tunisia and Morocco)

After WWII Tunisia and Morocco won independence fairly easily so French became even more determined to hold onto Algeria and were willing to accept losses elsewhere in order to concentrate on this prime objective--therefore they agreed to grant autonomous status to Tunisia after a mere two years of armed resistance to French rule. As with the Afrikaners in South Africa, the French in Algeria did not regard themselves as mere colonists. They viewed Algeria their homeland--fathers and grandfathers had lived and worked there.

1. Armed revolt against French in ALGERIA began in 1954, only four months after they had been ousted from Indochina and in no mood to compromise. Paris govt resolved to crush the uprising. Result was brutal, exhausting struggle that lasted until 1962. This struggle cost the French nearly $1 billion annually BUT the Algerians paid dearly in human terms--nearly 1 million dead (or 1\9 their total numbers).

2. In May 1958 a North African "Committee of Public Safety" seized power in Algeria in order to establish an authoritarian regime to hold the empire together. Demoralized National Assembly bowed to this show of force.

3. DeGalle uses his ;power and popularity to end the bloodshed in Algeria and in 1962 declares Algeria independent thus ending the French African empire that began in 1830 when French soldiers first landed in Africa and covered nearly 4 million miles and contained more than 41 million people.

 

Top | Back to Index...