Distributed
Cognition and Problem Solving
nDistributed
Cognition emphasizes the distributed nature of cognitive phenomena across
individuals, artifacts, and representations that are both internal and
external, Hutchins (1980).
nAn artifact is
any object made, modified, or used by people.
nA
representation is a set of codes that are combined and held in mind in the form
of analogs of ideas, images, and other sensory information.
nIt is
understood in terms of a common language of Ôrepresentational statesÕ and Ômedia,Õ
Hutchins (1980).
nRepresentational
states are defined by the configuration of elements in a medium that can be
interpreted as a representation.
nMedia consists
of messages that are distributed throughout technology.
nDistributed
Cognition can be analyzed at the work setting level and at the brain level.

n Where is
Cognition Distributed?
nÒInÓ the
person
nKnowledge and
forms of thought are not uniformly distributed in the brain.
nWhich parts of
the brain that are engaged and the way an individual gets through a particular
event depends on the cultural aspects of that event.
nÒInÓ the
medium culture
nThe context of
behavior and the ways in which cognition is distributed depends on the
combination of goals, tools, and setting as defined by the medium culture.
nÒInÓ the
social world
nCognitive
processes are located both in the immediate setting and the upcoming activity,
which is presupposed in all actions.
nWithin each
local setting, cognitive actions, such as remembering and decision making, are
distributed among the artifacts, rules, and the division of labor.
nÒInÓ Time
nPeople pull
information from their cultural past, projected it into the future, and then
carry this purely conceptual ÒfutureÓ back into the present in the shape of
beliefs.
nThese beliefs
then constrain and organize a personÕs socio-cultural environment.
n Distributed
Cognition is not a new concept.
nDistributed
Cognition is deeply rooted in social constructivism-- or, the social- cultural
ideas of Vygotsky.
nAccording to
Hugo Munsterberg, cognition occurs not only Òin the head,Ó where millions of
brain cells interact outside the range of consciousness to Òremember, think,
and will for us,Ó but also in objective elements of communication among
individuals (1914).
nWilhelm Wundt
believed that Òhigher psychological functions,Ó including processes of
reasoning and the products of language, could not be studied using laboratory
methods because the phenomena extended beyond individual human consciousness
(1921).
nAlexander
LuriaÕs Mediation Triangle
n
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
ÒMan differs from animals in that he can make and use tools.
These tools not only radically change his conditions of existence, they even
react on him in that they effect a change in him and his psychic condition.Ó
Alexander Luria, 1928, p.493.
n
Medium (artifact)
LuriaÕs mediations triangle provided a model identifying the
basic structure of human cognition that results from tool mediation.

Object
![]()
nÒNaturalÓ
(ÒunmediatedÓ) functions are those along the base of the triangle (S-O).
nÒCulturalÓ (ÒMediatedÓ)
functions are those where interactions between subject and object are mediated
by artifacts (S-M-O).
nHuman beings
are constantly acquiring culture so both routes essentially exist
simultaneously.
nAlexander
Luria believed that language was the integral part of the process of cultural
mediation. It is the Òtool of tools.Ó
nHe also
recognized that language enabled a person to deal with things that they have
not perceived even indirectly and with things which were part of the
experiences of past generations.
nBecause of
this, he says, humans live in a double world. The original mediation triangle
did not include time, so Luria modified it.
LuriaÕs
Modified Mediation Triangle with Time
Stn

n
n
We learned earlier that people pull information from their
cultural past, project it into the future, and then carry this conceptual
ÒfutureÓ back into the present in the shape of beliefs, which then lead the way
for behavior.
nLuria
describes this process suggesting that peopleÕs actions in the world require
analysis and synthesis of two sources of information in real time.
nOne source is
directly given (Stn-On).
n
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Another source is culturally mediated.
(Stn-M-Osm).
nA new state of
mind arises in the subject when these two sources of information are analyzed
and synthesized in real time.
nEngstrom
expanded the model to include other people, social rules, and the division of
labor between the subject and others.
nThis is
the crux of Distributed Cognition.
Division Of Labor Rules Community

nSchwartz (
JRTE, in press) offers some educational implications in light of distributed
cognition.
nÒAccording to
Schwartz (in press), ÒCognition is propagated from mind to mind; mind to tool,
and tool to mind in such a way that it:
(a) is shared between the constituents of the group, (b) creates
representations within and between the minds and manifests artifacts of the
group, and (c) combines itself into a dynamic coordinated system.Ó
nViewing
cognition as a distributed system allows one to inspect the processes of
learning.
nWhen teachers
use inspection it permits them to examine the variables within the learning
process.
nInspection
also focuses teachersÕ attention on their own, as well as their studentsÕ,
cognitive events.
nTeachers
become mindful of the recursive and reciprocal influence their learners have on
the activities and things they do to teach.
nIt also makes
salient the artifacts students leave behind from their attempts at
understanding.
nDistributed
cognition has the potential to increase the likelihood teachers will make
careful selections of the tools they employ for teaching.
n The problem
of technology use in schools today.
nÒEducation is
the only business still debating the usefulness of technology.Ó Rod Paige, U.S. Secretary of Education
nFunding is not
the source behind the problem. Instead the issue concerns a lack of adequate
training and low understanding of how computers can be used to enrich the
learning experience.
nSchwartz (in
press) believes that teachers find it difficult to use technology to teach
because they fail to think of technology as cognitive tools.
nOne major tool that reveals the distributed nature of cognition is Virtual Learning Environments.