For your final assigned
reading in Hot, Flat and Crowded, I
am combining material from chapters 9 and 16 that focuses on energy. Chapter 9 focuses on the quarter of
humanity that does not have regular access to an electricity grid and how that
influences their lives. The part
of chapter 16 that I have included describes how the US military has become an
innovator in energy conservation and green energy production which might have
applications for that energy impoverished portion of the worldÕs population.
Question Set for Ch 9 of Hot,
Flat and Crowded: Energy Poverty. P
194-.
1. The 3rd
paragraph on p. 194 effectively shows how energy impoverished sub-Saharan
Africa is relative to Europe and China.
The contrast would be even greater if Friedman had compared electrical
power production in the US to Africa. P. 195 demonstrates how energy
impoverished other regions of the world are and how energy poverty has not
gained the attention of rich countries of the world.
2. Why is there so much
energy poverty in the world?
Because so many poor
countries canÕt secure financing to build energy infrastructure (generating
plants, transmission gridsÉ). They
canÕt secure financing because so many of them have poor records of governance
or are plagued by recurring civil war.
International lending institutions understandably view these countries
as extremely bad risks.
3. How would you support FriedmanÕs claim that, ÒEvery
problem of the developing world is also an energy problemÓ?
At the village level,
energy poverty undermines health, agriculture, education, communications,
womenÕs and girlsÕ education and development. In the cities, energy poverty cripples manufacturing
productivity with blackouts.
4. How is energy poverty
going to become worse for the worldÕs poor in a ÒHot WorldÓ?
Global climate change
models predict that increases in global temperatures will cause more severe and
frequent meteorological extremes (floods, droughtsÉ). These extreme events will
jeopardize the livelihoods of the poor whose primary resources are basic
natural resources (forests, soil, plants, glaciers). For example the drying out of soil will compromise
agriculture. The poor will not be
able to draw on technologies (electric pumps, refrigerated storage of foodsÉ)
that the electrified world takes for granted.
5. How is energy poverty
going to become worse for the worldÕs poor in a ÒFlat WorldÓ?
Remember a ÒFlat WorldÓ is
a highly connected world. Those
connections depend on large and consistent amounts of electricity. In energy impoverished areas, the lack
of electricity excludes people from those connections and that flat world. And so the gap between their standard
of living and that of the flat world increases dramatically.
6. Why does Friedman want the
poor to be connected to the flat world in a Òflat and greenÓ manner?
Friedman is aware that if
one quarter of humanity became electrified in the same manner that we were
(fossil fuels), climate change and air pollution would become greatly
exacerbated. He urges that rich
countries develop the green energy technologies that will allow the energy poor
to become connected with Òclean electronsÓ, not the fossil fuels upon which our
development depended.
7. I strongly agree with FriedmanÕs
point that we currently are missing out on the ingenuity and inventiveness of
one quarter of humanity because they are not electrified. If rich countries can connect these
people to the electricity grid with clean electrons our human capacity will
greatly increase.
8. How is energy poverty
going to become worse for the worldÕs poor in a ÒCrowded WorldÓ?
The Òcrowded worldÓ is the
increasingly urbanized world. Poor
countriesÕ large urban areas, because they are electrified, often provide
villagers with the only opportunity for non-agricultural employment. However, rural to urban migration has
created unhealthful and inefficient mega-cities in poor countries of the world. The creation of green energy
technologies can strengthen village economies by connecting them to the Òflat
worldÓ. This can reduce rural to
urban migration and ease the problems of overcrowding. The green electrification of villages
will raise the standard of living, which usually slows population growth by
leading people to limit family size.
Question Set for Ch 16 of Hot,
Flat and Crowded: Outgreening
al-Qaeda (or, Buy One, Get Four Free). P 373-
1. Use the term Ògreen-hawkÓ
and Ògreen solutionÓ to explain what Friedman means by Òoutgreening al-QaedaÓ.
Friedman uses the term
Ògreen-hawkÓ to refer to US military personnel, some of them of quite high military
rank, who see that green technology can improve military effectiveness. These green hawks found themselves at a
disadvantage because the US military is a Òhigh-energy-consuming conventional
armyÓ that is/was fighting well-distributed, low energy forces in Afghanistan
and Iraq. A crucial component of the US military was that energy, mostly diesel
fuel, had to be transported to far-flung outposts, mostly in trucks, to power
air conditioners, computers. These trucks were favored targets of insurgents in
Iraq and Afghanistan. The green
hawks wanted the military to develop green solutions that reduced their
reliance on the trucks.
2. FriedmanÕs explanation of
how Central CommandÕs energy budget was used in Iraq gives you some idea of why
you should think of much of Iraq as equivalent to CaliforniaÕs Death
Valley. The summer time high
temperatures are astounding. Imagine fighting that war without the diesel
generators that provided air conditioning for our troops.
3. What does Friedman mean by
Òdistributed energyÓ and how would it improve security of soldiers?
Friedman uses the term
Òdistributed energyÓ to refer to energy producing systems (solar panels, wind
turbines) that can be set up at each of the scattered military installations
and produce enough energy for each outpost. Should the military create such a system, fuel trucks would
not have to be on the road and IEDs would not cause so much damage.
4. Why did diesel fuel cost at least $20 a gallon in Iraq? How did that high price influence military leaders? Use the term Òfully burdened costÓ in your answer. The Pentagon began a study in 2001 to determine how energy costs were influencing weapons systems and general war-planning. They found that the fully burdened cost of transporting fuel included the actual cost of the fuel, the cost of the vehicles to transport it, the drivers and the vehicles that accompanied the fuel trucks for protection. By taking into account all of the costs and not just the Òprice at the pumpÓ the military chose to investigate energy conservation strategies and the development of distributed energy.
5. Explain why Friedman
characterizes the temporary domed structure an example of Òbuy one, get four
freeÓ.
I
think this chapter is especially effective. Too many US citizens dismiss energy conservation and green
technology as concerns of left-wing environmentalists. It will be more difficult for those
nay-sayers to be dismissive of energy conservation and green technology when they
learn of US militaryÕs efforts to become more energy efficient and to develop
and incorporate green technology into protecting US citizens and allies.
The
domed structures were an experiment to reduce the energy demands created by
soldiersÕ housing, tents. The
military turned to foam insulation applied to the outside of this experimental
structure and concrete-lined interior walls. The domed structures were powered by wind turbines and solar
panels and a back-up propane generator.
The
foam-concrete lined walls and dome design cut energy demand by 40-70%. This reduction in energy demand, and
the fully burdened cost of fuel made the green energy technologies practical.
Friedman
calls this Òone for fourÓ because this one solution (an energy-efficient
structure) produced another 4 benefits: saved lives of fuel truck drivers, saved
money by reducing fuel use, provided excess wind and solar energy to local
population and increased the expectations of returning soldiers that the US
will seek solutions to problems that include greater energy efficiency and
green technology.