Skip to Main Content
California State University, Chico

Current Reaccreditation Effort

Ready For WSCUC 2026-27 banner with Wildcat Statue.

Institutional Report

Chico State has submitted its Institutional Report to the WASC Senior College and University Commission (WSCUC) as part of our comprehensive reaccreditation process.

The report provides an overview of Chico State’s accomplishments, challenges, and priorities and demonstrates how the University fulfills the WSCUC Standards. It highlights our commitment to student success, educational quality, assessment, and continuous improvement.

The report reflects the contributions and work of faculty, staff, administrators, and students across the University.

View the Chico State WSCUC Institutional Report

As we prepare for the WSCUC Team Visit on the 24th-26th of February 2027, we encourage the Chico State community to review the report and become familiar with the story it tells about our University and our ongoing commitment to student success and institutional improvement.

Chico State WSCUC self-study graphic highlighting 10 insights from the accreditation process.

Report Summary

View our WSCUC poster used in our Academic Affairs Town Hall in September 9, 2026 that provides a nice summary of our Institutional Report and next steps in our reaffirmation process.

Distance Education Review Form

The Distance Education Review Form is a required component of Chico State’s WSCUC reaccreditation submission. It provides additional information about the University’s distance education programs, policies, practices, and oversight, and demonstrates how Chico State ensures the quality and effectiveness of distance education in support of student learning and success.

View the Chico State Distance Education Review Form.

The form is submitted as a companion document to the Institutional Report and is reviewed by WSCUC as part of the accreditation process. It is not directly linked from the Institutional Report; unlike the Compliance with WSCUC Standards Form and Federal Review forms, which are referenced through the report’s Appendix, the Distance Education Review Form is provided separately.

Executive Committee

  • Steve Perez, President
  • Leslie Cornick, Provost and VP of Academic Affairs (AA)
  • Isaac Brundage, VP of Student Affairs (SA)
  • Jamie Clyde, VP of Business and Finance (BF)
  • Monique Sendze, VP of Information Technology (IT)
  • Kristine Mazzei, VP of University Advancement (UA)
  • Reg Chhen Stewart, University Diversity Officer

Steering Committee

  • Kate McCarthy, WSCUC ALO, Co-Chair
  • Ben Juliano, Co-Chair
  • Mahalley Allen, AA
  • Michael Coons, Academic Senate Chair
  • Serge Desir, SA
  • Tricia Douthit, IT
  • Ashley Gebb, President's designee
  • Jennifer Gruber, AA
  • Scott Kodai, IT
  • Ysabella Marin, Student Senator
  • Rachel McBride-Praetorius, Tribal Relations
  • Rebecca Nelson, Staff Council representative
  • Ryan Patten, AA
  • Shawn Ryan, SA
  • Curtis Sicheneder, BF
  • Andrew Staples, UA
  • Kureha Takayama, AS Government
  • Clare Van Ness, AA
  • Michael Watts, Library

 

Timeline of Chico State's Accreditation process.

Note: Click on the image above to view a larger version.

Campus Engagement

The WSCUC institutional self-study is designed to be a collaborative and reflective process that engages the entire university community. To support broad participation, the WSCUC Steering Committee conducted three surveys during the self-study process to gather perspectives from university employees and students.

The surveys served the following purposes:

  • Identify institutional initiatives and practices that demonstrate the university’s commitment to the WSCUC Core Commitments and Standards.
  • Collect stories and examples from across campus that illustrate how programs, services, and collaborations support student learning and student success.
  • Highlight areas of strength where the institution is making meaningful progress.
  • Identify opportunities for improvement, including areas where additional attention, resources, or coordination may strengthen institutional effectiveness.

The responses provided valuable insights that informed the institutional self-study, helping the university both celebrate effective practices and reflect on opportunities to enhance programs, processes, and student outcomes.

Review Our Survey Results

We welcome you to review some of the major findings from our campus engagement surveys by clicking the appropriate links below:

Requests for more detailed survey results should be sent directly to our campus WSCUC ALO.

Institutional Report Essay Teams

Essay 1: Mission and Integrity

  • Michael Coons
  • Ashley Gebb
  • Rachel McBride-Praetorius
  • Andrew Staples (Lead)

Essay 2: Educational Objectives and Student Success

  • Serge Desir
  • Jennifer Gruber
  • Kate McCarthy (Lead)
  • Shawn Ryan
  • Clare Van Ness

Essay 3: Resources and Organizational Structures

  • Mahalley Allen
  • Scott Kodai
  • Rebecca Nelson (Lead)
  • Curtis Sicheneder

Essay 4: Quality Assurance and Improvement

  • Tricia Douthit (Lead)
  • Ben Juliano
  • Ysabella Marin
  • Ryan Patten

Visiting Team

  • Rhoberta Haley

    Team Member
    Dean, School of Nursing
    Pacific Lutheran University

  • Bonnie Irwin

    Team Chair
    Chancellor
    University of Hawaii at Hilo

  • Sharlene Sayegh

    Team Assistant Chair
    Director of Institutional Assessment
    CSU, Long Beach

  • Deborah Wallace

    Team Member
    VP, Administration and Finance
    CSU, Dominguez Hills

  • Fanny Yeung

    Team Member
    AVP, Institutional Strategy and Effectiveness
    CSU, East Bay