Annual program learning outcomes assessment and periodic program review are two interconnected processes that ensure continuous improvement of the academic programs we offer at Chico State. The diagram below illustrates this synergy:
In the diagram above
- Faculty are involved in regular course assessment each semester. They use direct, observable feedback from their students and our campus Student Feedback on Teaching and Learning (SFOT) survey at the end of the semester to make adjustments in the courses they teach.
- Each year, faculty and chairs (or program directors/coordinators) conduct annual program learning outcomes (PLOs) assessment of their programs by evaluating and reporting on their students' achievement of PLOs selected for assessment in the prior academic year. Campus requires the submission of an Annual Program Assessment Report (APAR) from each academic program.
- At least every 5 years, academic programs go through a periodic program review. Internal program reviews are subject to our campus program review process, while external program reviews are coordinated with discipline-specific accrediting agencies.
- At least every 8 years, our university goes through a re-affirmation process to maintain Chico State's WSCUC accreditation.
The information from each enclosed process is used to apprise the next enclosing process; hence, it is critical that these processes are nurtured to sustain continuous improvement of our academic programs.