Meriam Library(opens in new window)
Office of Academic Personnel (OAPL)(opens in new window)
Office of Accessible Technology and Services (OATS)(opens in new window)
Promoting student engagement can be, at times, a challenge. Student centered and experiential learning are important for improving achievement, supporting retention of knowledge and skills, and helping students develop the “soft” skills that will support them as lifelong learners. If choosing to evaluate participation as part of course grading, it helps to have a plan for how to do so. Grading and evaluating participation comes with advantages and disadvantages, so it is important to think through your plan and rationale.
Examine selected research on evaluating student participation.
Paulson, J. (2015). Cultural considerations in the assessment of class participation in international online courses (PDF). International Conference 2015. Southeast Asian Ministers of Education Organization. Retrieved June 23, 2021 from http://www.vnseameo.org/InternationalConference2015/presentation/IIB1JamesPaulson/II-B-1%20Dr.%20James%20Paulson%20-%20Full%20Paper.pdf (PDF)
Wilke, C. A. (2012). (opens in new window)The online discussion conference grading rubric (PDF). University of Maryland Global Campus. Retrieved June 23, 2021 from https://www.scu.edu/media/offices/provost/assessment/Collection-of-rubrics-for-online-discussions.pdf (PDF)
Ready to apply strategies for evaluating participation to your teaching? Here are some ideas and strategies to get you started:
EXPLORE | LISTEN | WATCH | READ |
Evaluating Online Participation (Chiara Ferrari) Assessing Online Participation (Center for Teaching & Educational Technologies) | Grading Class Participation: Using a Rubric, Not an Impression (Ann Ferren Conference) Could You Teach without Grades (Cult of Pedagogy) | Grading Participation (Midway Instructional Technology) Things to Consider when Grading Participation (Webinar Clip) | Creating a Class Participation Rubric (Faculty Focus) |